Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Still Considering Tanker Deal
AP ^ | 3-3-08 | MATTHEW DALY

Posted on 03/03/2008 4:47:33 PM PST by NoLibZone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 03/03/2008 4:47:34 PM PST by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Conservatives are against big govt, pork, and earmarks for the district; Liberals are against military spending, but when it comes to defense contracts all rules are thrown out.

Defense spending is not a public works program.


2 posted on 03/03/2008 4:50:35 PM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Yeah, what about not using a U.S. based company? What not use Boeing?

McCain had better make up his mind soon.


3 posted on 03/03/2008 4:50:35 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

maybe there are good reasons. All these reasons have been stated.


4 posted on 03/03/2008 4:51:50 PM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

EADS/Northrop Grumman simply proposed a better plane for the contract. They should win.


5 posted on 03/03/2008 4:53:49 PM PST by rottndog (2008 Marches on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

With the price of the dollar dropping against the euro, will the price of the planes increase (paying more dollars to pay European manufacturers and workers)?


6 posted on 03/03/2008 4:57:12 PM PST by Jedi Master Pikachu ( What is your take on Acts 15:20 (abstaining from blood) about eating meat? Could you freepmail?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
“Defense spending is not a public works program”

How smart is it to have your war aircraft built by foreign countries?

7 posted on 03/03/2008 4:58:45 PM PST by southernerwithanattitude ({new and improved redneck})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
EADS/Northrop Grumman simply proposed a better plane for the contract. They should win.

Caught that after rereading the article. EADS/Northrup Grumman is US-partnered company. If their product is better for the price, why should Boeing always get the nod just because Obama & Hillary want it to be so.

8 posted on 03/03/2008 4:59:18 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jedi Master Pikachu

Most of the work is being done in the US (critics won’t tell you). Also, smart business people use the currency’s futures market to hedge. Or maybe they are paying the american workers in Ameros.


9 posted on 03/03/2008 4:59:21 PM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Northrop Grumman is U.S. based. What’s the problem?

Boeings is a hypocrite: http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=auburn01&date=20040601&query=boeing+johannesburg

10 posted on 03/03/2008 4:59:52 PM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: southernerwithanattitude

MOST of the plane is being built here in the US.


11 posted on 03/03/2008 5:00:08 PM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Northrup Grumman is a U.S.based company, right? So what’s the problem?
Boeings is a hypocrite:

http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=auburn01&date=20040601&query=boeing+johannesburg

12 posted on 03/03/2008 5:01:59 PM PST by taxesareforever (Never forget Matt Maupin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Caught that after rereading the article. EADS/Northrup Grumman is US-partnered company. If their product is better for the price, why should Boeing always get the nod just because Obama & Hillary want it to be so.

In the long run, it's also bad for Boeing if they don't have to compete like everyone else. I think they relied too much on sentiment in this process, rather than substance.
13 posted on 03/03/2008 5:02:47 PM PST by rottndog (2008 Marches on...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: madison10
How come Lockheed/Martin isn’t mentioned? Did they even bid? C-130s have been fueling jets for decades.
14 posted on 03/03/2008 5:02:49 PM PST by southernerwithanattitude ({new and improved redneck})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

True it mostly is. But 42% is not.

http://www.northropgrumman.com/kc30/operations/section.html

That 42% is being built By Airbus which is in Tolusee France.

Google Muslims Riot in France.


15 posted on 03/03/2008 5:03:42 PM PST by NoLibZone (Duncan Hunter- The very Govts unwilling to support us in the WOT got the Fuel Tanker Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

We don’t build Airbuses in the U.S.

Big deal they put the tanks in them in Mobile.


16 posted on 03/03/2008 5:04:36 PM PST by southernerwithanattitude ({new and improved redneck})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: southernerwithanattitude

John Murtha was out sick that day. Maybe they chose not to bid.


17 posted on 03/03/2008 5:06:44 PM PST by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I don’t want MY F-22s to have to depend on a “French” airtanker for fuel!

{Who knows they might surrender}


18 posted on 03/03/2008 5:08:08 PM PST by southernerwithanattitude ({new and improved redneck})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rottndog
EADS/Northrop Grumman simply proposed a better plane for the contract. They should win.

Not really. The EADS base contract is slightly less than Boeing, but the maintenance cost and overall operating expenses of the EADS/Airbus make it a sour deal.

19 posted on 03/03/2008 5:08:39 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

Ford is a US based company that owns Land Rover and Volvo.

Did you know that Range Rovers are not made in the US?


20 posted on 03/03/2008 5:09:55 PM PST by NoLibZone (Duncan Hunter- The very Govts unwilling to support us in the WOT got the Fuel Tanker Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson