The restriction in this case IS religiously motivated. The polling place should be moved or the restriction lifted. It’s a simple as that.
You cannot place religious restrictions upon voters or poll workers. This type of restriction could very well be extended to type of attire, speech, actions or any other criteria. If the Church cannot abide by the actions of the public, then it should not offer its building to be used. If they are offering it as a public service, then they should respect the public.....otherwise don’t offer.
I agree, colorcountry.
“The restriction in this case IS religiously motivated.”
So what?
Are you going to object if the local synagogue permits itself to be used as a polling place, and they require folks not bring ham sandwiches?
The restrictions should be looked at on their face. Do the election authorities wish to accept these restrictions or not? My own polling place - a firehouse - forbids food and beverage. Why? I can only guess. However, the motivation is unimportant. If the burden isn’t too great, then the election authorities accept. If it’s too great, they should move on.
Whether the restrictions arise from religious or non-religious motivations is not only not important BUT NOT A LEGITIMATE INTEREST OF THE GOVERNMENT.
Otherwise, the government is placed in the position of discriminating against religious organizations. See: Bill of Rights, 1st Amendment.
sitetest