Posted on 03/01/2008 3:28:56 AM PST by PeaceBeWithYou
There is that...
This 1 Kw/M^2 is valid ONLY at the equator, at local apparent noon (from 11:15 to 12:15 each day), on a cloudless day, with a perfect absorber/reflector/transmitter/receiver/converter. (In space.)
No matter how you play with your umbers, solar power is 40-75% more expensive than conventional. Even using the unreasonable assumptions of this advertisement.
Solar power is more expensive, in most cases, than gas/coal/hydro/nuke.
It is much cheaper the further one gets from the installed power line base. A full blown home solar system has a much cheaper installation cost than running a even couple miles of power lines, and is essentially free to operate.
As fuel costs continue to rise solar becomes more cost effective. It isn’t there yet, but will be fairly soon.
Solar power is a joke.
It’s for folks that don’t mind tepid showers.
I get a kick out of “legislation” that dictates specific percentages of “renewable energy”. Then when the sun doesn’t shine enough, or the wind doesn’t blow enough, the power company is obligated to allocate the balance from their coal fired plants......????
Tepid? You can easily scald yourself with solar heated water IN ARIZONA!
Therein lies the key!
You must be relatively close to the power generating source due to line loss constraints. Therefore, nationally, solar power is NOT a solution.
It's because all the "middle men" rob the farmers of any decent profit they can make. Til they've invested in all their equipment, land, etc., they just simply can't make enough to make a decent profit, especially considering it's a 24/7 job in most cases.
Easier and better money can be made elsewhere, so unless you REALLY have a love of farming, then why not do something else?
Solar is a pitiful Return on Investment and only serves to make people feel good.
As for the “image” of nuclear power, we need to get more facts on the table regarding the very real solutions available for nuclear waste disposal.
The permitting time for construction time must be reduced and the best way to facilitate this is to standardize two reactor designs for the nation.
The construction process must be better supervised to ensure quality and avoid wasted time.
Only a few farmers with truly piss poor land are eligible to sign up for it. For the average farmer with even passable land it's a bad choice as their rate of pay is terrible and you have to sign up for a lengthy amount of time. Better to plant a poor crop of corn or soybeans than participate in these “free checks”
And another one under the forestry service that pays you an amount to plant trees. But there again the returns ain’t great and you have to lock up the land until the trees maturity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.