Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: torchthemummy

This was posted earlier today also. According to what other people said, the Clinton campaign was involved in writing the rules for the election/caucus process in Texas. So.........if they were involved in writing the rules, how in good conscience can they sue or threaten to sue about it?

Reminds me of the Florida and Michigan delegates not being allowed in the Dem. convention because they had primaries before Feb. 5th. The Clinton campaign and all Democrats agreed that these were the rules. Hillary was the only major candidate with a name on the ballot in Michigan. After the fact, the Clintons want those delegates counted.


3 posted on 02/29/2008 4:37:22 PM PST by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego
"So.........if they were involved in writing the rules, how in good conscience can they sue or threaten to sue about it?"

Easy! It's only "fair" as long as "Her Thighness" is winning. It is inconceivable that she should lose, so therefore, the system must be unfair and the lawsuits must begin.

You just have to put on your Clymer Goggles to view the world as a liberal and then it will all make sense to you.

7 posted on 02/29/2008 4:43:56 PM PST by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego

And don’t forget the casino workers being able to caucus at work in Nevada. The Clintons were all for it when they thought the casino workers union was going to endorse Hillary. When they endorsed Obama instead, Hillary screamed that it was unfair.


14 posted on 02/29/2008 5:19:23 PM PST by G.Love ( Romney '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson