To: CedarDave; 2ndDivisionVet; A knight without armor; Alexander Rubin; AmericaUnite; ...
Read the story. Take the poll. (link in post #20)
The kicker from the story: "The judge also ordered Richard to pay Romero's family $500 a month in restitution for five years."
70% say the sentence too harsh. I agree.
FREEP THIS POLL ***PING!*** FRmail me if you want to be added or removed from the Fearless Poll-Freeping Freepers Ping list. And be sure to ping me to any polls that need Freepin', if I miss them. (looks like a medium volume list) (gordongekko909, founder of the pinglist, stays on the list until his ghost signs up for the list)
30 posted on
02/29/2008 10:53:35 AM PST by
dynachrome
(Immigration without assimilation means the death of this nation~Captainpaintball)
To: dynachrome
The judge also ordered Richard to pay Romero's family $500 a month in restitution for five yearsWell, that's just silly.
Romero was probably sponging $500 a month off his family while he was alive.
His family probably owe Richard $30K.
31 posted on
02/29/2008 10:59:42 AM PST by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: dynachrome
Do you think 2 years in prison was enough in the Elton John Richard II case?
Too harsh, he was only protecting his property.
1692 72.1%
Too light, he should have gotten at least 6 years.
349 14.9%
About right, since a life was taken.
307 13.1%
32 posted on
02/29/2008 11:00:05 AM PST by
pattty
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson