Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ameribbean expat
New Hampshire and other early states have “open” primaries where the people voting aren’t necessarily GOP registered voters, yet no similar punitive action was taken by the RNC.

Wrong. NH, MI, and SC all lost 50%.

41 posted on 02/28/2008 7:50:47 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: GraniteStateConservative

Those states lost 50% of their delegates because they also moved their elections to dates before 05 Feb.

My beef is specifically with the fact that the RNC gets its knickers in a bunch over who votes when (who the hell cares?) while the party’s control over who its own nominee will be is diluted through the open primary process.

Why haven’t “open” primary states been penalized by the RNC with lowered delegate counts? The loss of influence and control over your own nominee is a helluva lot more important than on what day a state has a primary.

My point stands: screw the RNC until they get a handle on brand management.


48 posted on 02/28/2008 8:12:23 AM PST by ameribbean expat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson