Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

I thought that McCain was right to distance himself from Cunningham’s remarks (now donning asbestos suit). What he said is that he wants to treat his two Democratic rivals with respect. He wants discourse to be civil. I prefer this in a candidate and I don’t think that McCain had any choice but to make the remarks that he did unless he wished to appear hopelessly partisan. I think that Cunningham should apologize for his lack of civility. Remember just last year when we were honoring the late Gerald Ford in part because of his civility - asking McGovern over to the White House in the interests of civility.


14 posted on 02/28/2008 7:09:33 AM PST by beejaa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: beejaa
Agreed. I don't have a high opinion of Obama, and if I were to analyze Cunningham's remarks there might not be much I really disareed with, but this was a campaign event for McCain and he went way overboard, forcing McCain to distance himself from him. Maybe McCain could have finessed his comments a bit better, but Cunningham probably would have thrown a fit whatever McCain said.

The local organizers should either not have had Cunningham as a warm-up act, or got him to agree to refrain from inflammatory language that would put McCain on the spot.

Cunningham and Limbaugh want the election to be all about them, even if it means electing Obama. With all of McCain's shortcomings, having Obama as President would be far worse for the country, both domestically and for foreign policy. How many days was Cunningham tortured by the North Vietnamese?

32 posted on 02/28/2008 7:19:37 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: beejaa
McCain is an @$$hat who wants to treat the enemy (but not his potential allies) with “dignity” and “respect.”

That doesn’t work with terrorists or with Democrats.

And POing the conservatives doesn’t get Republicans elected, either.

36 posted on 02/28/2008 7:21:59 AM PST by Little Ray (So its McCain or Huckabee? Pass me the bloody KoolAid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: beejaa

beejaa

YOU may have been “honoring” Gerald Ford, one of the worst presidents in the 20th Century, but conservatives were certainly not!


55 posted on 02/28/2008 7:34:54 AM PST by levotb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: beejaa
Remember just last year when we were honoring the late Gerald Ford in part because of his civility

Democrats loved Ford because he lost. McCain shouldn't have had Cunningham as a speaker, as he needs the Dem and crossover votes. Cunningham could have done what he does, while McCain does what he does. As it is, McCain is doing everything he can to make it harder to hold your nose and vote for him.

76 posted on 02/28/2008 7:46:11 AM PST by Richard Kimball (Sure, they'd love to kill me, as long as they can do it without admitting I exist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: beejaa

“don’t think that McCain had any choice but to make the remarks that he did unless he wished to appear hopelessly partisan.”

This is Juanito, there is no chance that he would EVER be seen as “hopelessly partisan” unless....you don’t think that he would switch parties do you?


137 posted on 02/28/2008 8:20:50 AM PST by Grunthor (McCain voters believe that it's possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson