Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What makes this even worse is that the new york times is now basically saying that any child born to a service member overseas is not a natural born citizen.

I’m guessing the only reason they would want this is to prevent the children of military members from ever being able to run for President.

And do tell me, what party affiliation are the majority of military members and their children?


16 posted on 02/28/2008 4:15:11 AM PST by gjones77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: gjones77
What makes this even worse is that the new york times is now basically saying that any child born to a service member overseas is not a natural born citizen.

I thought this was common knowledge, are it was when I went to school. The people who wrote the constitution did not believe in having military spread across the world. Don't bitch at me, you need to take it up with them.

21 posted on 02/28/2008 4:22:02 AM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: gjones77

Did you even read the article?

It brings up the question, and pretty much says it’s a moot point, McCain and other Military Children born outside the US would still be considered Natural Born because they weren’t citizens of the host country.

I swear to God the NYTimes is doing all this stuff to help McCain shore up his conservative base.

Good old freerepublic:
Before: McCain is a Liberal!!! The NYTIMES endorsed him!!!!!
Now: The NYSLIMES is attacking conservative McCain!!!


31 posted on 02/28/2008 4:43:42 AM PST by Philly Nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson