[1L]

That statute says nothing about naturalization or natural born. I thought I already stated that. You are making the assumption that if he’s a citizen, he’s a natural born or naturalized one. MAYBE that’s true, but this statute doesn’t support it. The statute doesn’t define the constitutional terms.

If you disagree, please provide the actual section that does.

[palmer]

That statute says nothing about naturalization or natural born.

True, like many statutes they don't use the same terminology. But that's why there are lawyers and judges to make sense of it. Here's the interpretation I agree with:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1977679/posts?page=31#31

Your view may or may not be expressed by post 22 in the same thread, but I think 31 is a satisfactory answer.