Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kay Ludlow

I thought since he was born on a military base that this would not be a problem. The base is considered American soil.


100 posted on 02/27/2008 6:34:27 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
  "I thought since he was born on a military base that this would not be a problem. The base is considered American soil."

Despite widespread popular belief, U.S. military installations abroad and U.S. diplomatic or consular facilities are not part of the United States. It is NOT sovereign soil. The land is still owned by the host country, but diplomatic missions are exempt from local law and in almost all respects treated as part of the territory of the home country. For example the host country may not enter the representing country's embassy without permission, but they still own it.

176 posted on 02/27/2008 6:48:38 PM PST by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

“...natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States” -Article 3, Section 1, Clause 5. If he was born in Moscow in such circumstance that there is no paperwork necessary for him to be a citizen of the United States, he is a “natural born citizen...” They are just trying to plant the notion of cheating in the heads of people who have not read the Constitution, which is probably 99.xx percentage of the public school graduates in the last couple of generations.


218 posted on 02/27/2008 6:59:19 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson