To: kiriath_jearim
Not hardly. They come across legally as welcomed guests.
2 posted on
02/27/2008 5:26:58 PM PST by
CindyDawg
To: kiriath_jearim
Instead of a fence, make it a wall. Then we won’t have to listen to these whiners when we exercise our sovereignty.
3 posted on
02/27/2008 5:34:05 PM PST by
popdonnelly
(Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
To: kiriath_jearim
Gotta love the imagery.
The anti-fence side:
"festive"
"traditions"
"pomp and ceremony"
"vivid colors"
"lively celebrations"
The pro-fence side:
"glare"
"exploiting"
"forces"
"ramrod"
"noisy"
4 posted on
02/27/2008 5:43:48 PM PST by
ruination
To: kiriath_jearim
Media bias? There ain’t no stinkin’ media bias, gringo!
5 posted on
02/27/2008 5:53:45 PM PST by
polymuser
(Those who believe in something eventually prevail over those who believe in nothing.)
To: kiriath_jearim
People like this need to get their heads out of their butts.
To their way of thinking America should forget about controlling the border and stopping millions of illegals poring in every year because it causes them a small inconvenience once a year.
Is it more important for them to get their Mexican friends across the border to attend their local festival once a year or for the whole country to get a grip on the illegal alien traffic into the country that costs us all trillions of dollars?
Well, we know what their answer is but they are outvoted.
Let them throw the festival on the other side of the river or work out a plan to get one day visas to their Mexican friends.
6 posted on
02/27/2008 7:33:30 PM PST by
Iron Munro
(Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson