Posted on 02/27/2008 3:58:55 PM PST by forkinsocket
Walter Cronkite’s remarks at the end of his February 27, 1968 evening news broadcast, four decades ago today, were a watershed in the history of the MSM’s credibility.
Unless you’re at least 55 years old, you probably don’t remember that CBS broadcast 40 years ago. The most trusted man in America had recently returned from Vietnam where he hosted a documentary on the VC/NVA TET (New Year) offensive that began January 31, 1968. Back in NYC, he closed his program that night by introducing “an analysis that must be speculative, personal, [and] subjective.” Among his comments were these:
Who won and who lost in the great Tet offensive against the cities? I’m not sure. The Vietcong did not win by a knockout, but neither did we. The referees of history may make it a draw.
It seems now more certain than ever that the bloody experience of Vietnam is to end in a stalemate.
But it is increasingly clear to this reporter that the only rational way out then will be to negotiate, not as victors, but as honorable people who lived up to their pledge to defend democracy, and did the best they could. (Emphases added)
Most evenings Cronkite ended his broadcasts with “And that’s the way it is.” That night he ended with a more somber, “This is Walter Cronkite. Good night.”
Today, it’s hard to fully appreciate the stature and status Cronkite held in 1968. He was the successor in fame to the demigod persona that had been Edward R. Murrow. When President Johnson heard of Cronkite’s comments, he was quoted as saying, “That’s it. If I’ve lost Cronkite, I’ve lost middle America.”
In January 2006, Cronkite said his statement on Vietnam was his proudest moment. When asked then if he would give the same advice on Iraq, Cronkite didn’t hesitate to say “Yes.”
At the time, Cronkite’s pronouncement added credibility and importance to all the network anchors. His was a stunning exercise of media power. But, in the perspective of history, the outcome of his pronouncement is not universally recognized as having been positive. He overtly and figuratively stepped out from behind the microphone to add his personal commentary to the news. We had not seen this before. By doing so, Cronkite issued an implicit license to his journalistic colleagues to interject personal opinions into their factual reporting of the news. The difference is that Cronkite clearly labeled it as personal opinion, while many MSM news personalities today weave their opinions into reporting. His sentiment registered with many, perhaps most, of his viewers that night. He changed opinions by offering his own. But in hindsight, his analysis was wrong – dead wrong for some.
Generally, the “referees of history” have not rendered the TET offensive a military draw. The VC/NVA suffered unexpectedly high casualties, from which it took years to recover. In particular, the ranks of the Viet Cong were decimated. General No Nguyen Giap, the Supreme Commander of the Viet Minh (NVA) forces said, in a 1989 interview with CBS’s Morley Safer, “We paid a high price, but so did you…not only in lives and material…After Tet the Americans had to back down and come to the negotiating table, because the war was not only moving into…dozens of cities and towns in South Vietnam, but also to the living rooms of Americans back home for some time. The most important result of the Tet offensive was it made you de-escalate the bombing, and it brought you to the negotiation table. It was, therefore, a victory…The war was fought on many fronts. At that time the most important one was American public opinion.” (The Vietnam War: An Encyclopedia of Quotations, Howard Langer, 2005)
The Vietnam War did not end in a stalemate, particularly for those S. Vietnamese who, at risk and often loss of life, loyally supported the U.S. Armed Forces (not all did, but very many did). We left them in a lurch, cut off their military aid, and watched while they suffered the consequences when the North Vietnamese blatantly ignored the negotiated resolution (they never intended to honor) that Cronkite advocated.
Many of those of us who served in Vietnam do not look upon its ending as reflecting “honorable people who lived up to their pledge to defend democracy.” A compelling case can be made that we should never have sent troops to Vietnam in the first place. But we did. And then, after nearly 60,000 U.S. deaths and countless Vietnamese casualties, we bugged out. There’s no way to put an honorable face on that unavoidable truth.
Once upon a time, I lived for awhile not far from a village called Ba Chuc in An Giang Province in the Mekong Delta. After the U.S. evacuated Vietnam, there was nothing to stop old animosities between the Cambodians and Vietnamese from turning hot. Here’s a description of what happened in Ba Chuc.
“On April 30, 1977, Pol Pot’s troops launched a surprise attack on 13 villages in eight Vietnamese border provinces. Ba Chuc was the hardest hit. The massacre was at its fiercest during the 12 days of occupation, April 18-30, 1978, during which the intruders killed 3,157 villagers. The survivors fled and took refuge in the pagodas of Tam Buu and Phi Lai or in caves on Mount Tuong, but they were soon discovered. The raiders shot them, slit their throats or beat them to death with sticks. Babies were flung into the air and pierced with bayonets. Women were raped and left to die with stakes planted in their genitals.”
There were two survivors to the massacre.
Cronkite didn’t cover it on the CBS evening news.
As judged by subsequent events, Cronkite was wrong. And over time, his words became a watershed marking the place where the gradual erosion of the MSM’s credibility began.
The day that "NEWS" died.
Guess Michelle Obama must have missed that one!
Cronkite has been quite candid about his bias. He has even admitted that since he retired he misses being able to set the agenda.
I would like to think that, in a better future time, Walter Chronkite will be tried on the basis of the Sedition Act and imprisoned until his well deserved (probably natural) death.
I believe that Mr. Cary has made an impressive analysis, but his dissertation on Crankcase doesn’t dig nearly deep enough in the “disdain” column. Crankcase was, clearly, so full of himself (and remains so) that he believed himself to be the super God in control of ALL news to which we peons were allowed to know. In that light, he not only assumed control over what news we were allowed to know, he also perverted Murrow’s alleged objectivism by introducing his own opinion.
History has since shown clearly that the Tet Offensive was not only a clear victory for US troops, but Crankcase’s “analysis” was a betrayal of both the troops fighting in Vietnam and his patriotism for the US. He defined himself as a traitor and communist sympathizer by his comments that night and I, for one, hope he ends up slowly rotting in h*ll over the next millenium before his putrifying flesh succumbs to death! He deserves nothing better.
Like Jane Fonda, he gave aid and comfort to our enemy and caused untold deaths of both American troops and innocent Vietnamese civilians by adding his support to our enemies.
CBS, Crankcase and the most despicable America-hating leftists are the only ones who consider Crankcase’s perversion of objective journalism to be a “watershed moment”. The rest of us are disgusted by the traitor.
Uncle Walt doesn’t realize he left his Petard on that set on February 27, 1968. We didn’t realize it for years either, but he also left SeeBS Smooze petard hanging there as well. With many months to go in school, on February 27, 1968 I was preparing to go to my draft board for the first time to defend my 2-S status....5 more visits and I finally got the 1-A that Fall, and my Greetings in my mail box, the first day on the job. I just saw that as a duty, so even then I didn’t realize how stupid Uncle Walt’s comments were, let alone that I’d be getting a SeeBS benefits check one day. Nope....US Army 1, CBS 0 is the score, no doubt about that...No doubt about the Domino Theory’s sound foundation, no doubt about the way the war started...no doubt about the brilliance of beefing up Khe Sanh before Tet, no doubt about the thumping we gave the NVA when we absconded with Billions of dollars worth of Russian equipment when we pulled back out of Cambodia in April-May, 1970...stifling the NVA and emasculating the Viet Cong for more than a year...giving hundreds of thousands of Americans an honorable exit from the country the USA Congress was turning into a Leper Colony. I was proud to be sending Troops home, then...then I came home, and it wasn’t long before Congress screwed the pooch...donating its own petard to trump even Uncle Walt and CBS’ stupidity. Then it got quiet...real quiet. Wouldn’t want American voters to find out about how stupid Congress Critters were back then, would we....we know how stupid they are now...given their Leadership, no doubt they’re following a lengthening shadow of stupid! Now that said, it does make for some fine entertainment, sure beats infomercials, big time
BUMP
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.