To: pissant
i agree with rove here. we will gain nothing by emphasizing his name. we need to attack his politics, which are radical enough, and leave his name out of it. it is superficial and will only make us look bad.
To: philsfan24
How about Black Muslim Obama?
To: philsfan24
i agree with rove here. we will gain nothing by emphasizing his name. we need to attack his politics, which are radical enough, and leave his name out of it. it is superficial and will only make us look bad. You are right but it will be done by the far right wackos of the Repub party. Gonna bite the Repubs in the fall.
49 posted on
02/27/2008 7:00:24 AM PST by
Intimidator
(It's not unilateral - just try saying you're a Progressive Democrat in your typical Evangelical chur)
To: philsfan24
We should attack the politics of both Senators B. Hussein and J. Sydney. Using their middle names doesn’t change the time it takes to say what you want to say about their poltiics. It is sooo girly to whine about something like this.
55 posted on
02/27/2008 7:02:00 AM PST by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: philsfan24
i agree with rove here. we will gain nothing by emphasizing his name. we need to attack his politics, which are radical enough, and leave his name out of it. it is superficial and will only make us look bad. Yes. It is making us look silly and insubstantial. But that isn't going to stop anyone. We'll have at least 4 years to complain about it starting in November if this is all we have. Karl Rove is trying to say that we have more to offer, but why should anyone listen to him? What's he ever done?
/s
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson