Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom
My reason for emphasising that they are still public schools was to point out that by attending them, parent's are still placing them in the care of the state - which certain courts have ruled to mean that the parents are abrogating their rights over their own children when in school.
106 posted on 02/27/2008 6:02:55 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Men fight well when they know that no prisoners will be taken.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

You are correct, my FRiend!


116 posted on 02/27/2008 6:08:35 AM PST by netmilsmom (Giving up "Hairspray" and the cast for Lent. Prayers appreciated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

“...parents are abrogating their rights over their own children when in school.”

Frankly, isn’t this true whenever you send a child out into some public space alone? At least always in a few things if not every aspect?

Each organization should have ITS own rights. If you don’t agree to them, go elsewhere. At least now we still have the choice to stay out of fully “public” schools. When you don’t have any choice, then your concerns are more valid, I’d say.


147 posted on 02/27/2008 6:30:10 AM PST by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson