Apparently, in your book, “Conservative” now means: irrational, sputtering, angry people with out a strategy...who will call the Canidates office to complain that he was too polite....I hope that’s not the case. It’s like a scene from Young Frankenstien, with the town people at the gate.... The game has just begun and already many are trying to trash the most conservative canidate in the bunch. Not very good thinking is one want to win the ultimate race....
“Apparently, in your book, “Conservative” now means: irrational, sputtering, angry people with out a strategy...who will call the Candidates office to complain that he was too polite....I hope that’s not the case. It’s like a scene from Young Frankenstien, with the town people at the gate.... The game has just begun and already many are trying to trash the most conservative canidate in the bunch. Not very good thinking is one want to win the ultimate race....”
Obviously his apology was dumb because it is creating infighting instead of focussing on the real prize, defeating Obama and winning the WH. If McCain didnt want firebrand speeches his mistake was to invite a firebrand to speak on his behalf. Post hoc apologies from second-hand sources don’t help at all.
A simple “hey, I didnt say it” suffices.
That leads me to believe you only joined our fine website to pimp your LIBERAL candidate, John MeCain!
Your candidate may indeed be better than a Liberal Democrat, but that doesn't mean I have to like a Liberal Republican.
You have the same mentality as your candidate, be nice to the liberals, be nice to the Big Media talking heads, be nice and write liberal legislation with the liberals across the isle.
You and your candidate just don't get it.