Interesting that you didn’t refute the validity of my comment. :)
If John McCain loses this November, it won’t be because someone in Columbus, Ohio calling himself “King Snorky” made a cutting remark about him on Free Republic. If McCain loses, it will because he failed to demonstrate to voters that he is truly a conservative alternative to the Democratic nominee.
What is it with you McCainiacs wanting to regulate everyone’s political speech? If you’re so concerned about the tone of political discourse in our country, then why are you supporting Charlie Keating’s notoriously foulmouthed, short-tempered concubine?
And for the record, I don’t think Hillary has fat thighs. Fat ankles, yes. But not fat thighs.
I did not think that a tabloid claim needed refuting but, if you insist, I refute the lie that John McCain wanted to be John Kerry's VP choice.
If your have proof for your claim, put it on the table.
What is it with you McCainiacs wanting to regulate everyone’s political speech?
Geez, what a Drama Queen.
Since when does tactical advice from Karl Rove constitute "regulating political speech"?
"Karl Rove just sent us a memo that said that if you want the Southern vote, you should not refer to Southerners as 'dumb rednecks that should vote for me if they know what is good for them'".
"Karl Rove wants to regulate my political speech! That's unconstitutional!! My First Amendment rights have been violated!!!"