Since PETA is not mentioned in the article, why did you add them to the headline?
As a Grabber
I think it comes down to the fact that SHARK takes all cases of animal abuse to represent all animal owners. Using their own logic, that means PETA represents all animal rights organizations. So if PETA were to have an 80% higher death rate in their animal shelters than the national average (which they do) then that would make SHARK equally guilty of hypocracy. I also notice on SHARKS YouTube they block any comments that disagree with their “facts.” Wonder why that is? It must be because fear makes you give them money. They can take any amount to salary themselves and write it off as “administration fees.” Typically 85-97% of the money you give them goes into their own pockets.