In your first post, you said:
“I would be in support of this weapon not being available for civilian purchase.”
Then you said that you didn’t want a law banning them. Just how would you keep them from being available without a law? And just how would no law be any more effective than any law that does purport to ban guns or people from getting those guns?
Then you really revealed your ignorance of history when you said:
“To defend one’s self from the Government? Not much use is this weapon when a tank is brought in to take someone out, is it?”
Ever hear of the Liberty Pistol? The Warsaw Ghetto?
I would suggest that you do some serious research. You are entitled to your opinion. Your are not entitled to ignore or make up your own facts.
FYI, I’ve recanted my comment form post #3. I didn’t think that comment out very well, and I’ve admitted to that. I’d like to move on from that if possible.