Posted on 02/24/2008 8:14:18 PM PST by Paleo Conservative
I agree, but the judgment should be kept within reason. If, every time a person or company is negligent, they are awarded tens of million of dollars (as you seemed to suggest they should be) it simply places an enormous tort tax on everyone who uses those products or services, and in many cases will completely drive them from the market.
In it's own sick little way...
“Flight attendants aren’t qualified to diagnose the need for O2.”
Believe me...at United Airlines, the flight attendants reached for the tank and administered oxygen whenever anyone was sick!
As an RN, I shook my head many times knowing that oxygen was not needed in many cases. But that was the only thing other flight attendants knew...they thought oxygen was the answer to any illness inflight.
I worked flights where we had to administer oxygen during the flight. We were all trained how to do it and what the PSI levels should be. During Jet Emergency Training, we had to “administer” it to each other.
Prayers for the victim and her family.
The airlines aren’t the only clueless ones......
I was in a Doctor’s office, sitting 3 ft. from an oxygen bottle (which I was in need of) and they couldn’t find the mask to administer it with!
They had to call the paramedics!!!
I wonder if this would have happened had AA not laid off all the TWA F/As after the buyout.
Don't the flight attendants have individual bottles? I thought that was how they continued to work in a decompression situation. At any rate, I'm not placing a lot of weight on what this dude says. I'll wait for the facts.
Not gonna comment on that one...
:>)
Stopped completely? You sure there wasn’t a little epinephrine involved there, too.
Exactly! As I said before, I not only checked "mine", I checked every other section's "just in case". It was drilled into our heads that we were NOT on the plane to pass out peanuts, but for SAFETY. I took that very seriously.
>As an RN, I shook my head many times knowing that oxygen was not needed in many cases.<
The O2 certainly wouldn’t cause any harm. It could only benefit the person by raising the O2 level in the brain.
“The O2 certainly wouldn’t cause any harm. It could only benefit the person by raising the O2 level in the brain.”
You’re talking like a layman. Believe me...it just wasn’t needed at times.
Yep. And if she wasn't 'fibbing', there was nothing to defib. I'd guess heart failure, and the reduced oxygen level brought on by altitude (most aircraft aren't pressurized at ground level) probably pushed her over the edge. Much more to be discovered here.
It was my bedside manner?
I didn’t get that the defibrillator didn’t work, I got that it had no affect. There is a difference.
**************************************************
I’ll wait for the second round of reporting here ,, this is too preliminary for me... I can see empty O2 bottles but an inop defib would be unusual ,, it’s the simplest piece of equipment ,, just some capacitors and a switch,, the only reason they cost more than $20 is because of lawsuits..
Maybe the boardroom eyes?
“I took that very seriously.”
We did too! If those tanks on that flight were indeed empty...the flight attendants no longer have a job, and AA is going to pay big time!
“Maybe the boardroom eyes?”
LOL!
“Maybe the boardroom eyes?”
Yeah..if they were bedroom eyes, I could have had a meatball sandwich instead of chicken...and even wine with it!
Yep.
I don’t think their F/A union could even bail them out of this one (Or would even want to). This is a bit beyond the “sneaking a bottle of champagne off the plane” infraction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.