Replies

"I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and to engage in fantasizing," wrote Rodham, without referring to the source of that allegation. "I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body."

WOW, Shrillary kicked off her career of attacking, demeaning, and discrediting women's stories of rape, harassment, and abuse with this assault on a 12 YEAR OLD GIRL. Amazing.

I do understand the principle of everyone is entitled to a defense in our legal system, but that does NOT mean everyone is entitled to such a depraved and dishonest defence!!! This is the worst aspect of our adversarial system, the prevailing idea that absolutely any b.s. that can be thrown up by an aggressive defense lawyer should be admitted and allowed to influence the case. A good judge should be free to exclude such a line of defence by demanding, in private session, the evidence (non-existent probably) that allowed Shrillary to claim "I have been informed that....." she smeared this terrible young rape victim without a shred of evidence for "blaming the victim" it would appear...... but of course the vicious Hildebeast went on to make a career out of "blaming the victim" whenever it was a woman standing in the path of the Clintonista juggernaut.