To: ScratInTheHat
“As we all know but are sometimes reluctant to contemplate, oil is a finite, non-renewable resource.”
Is this slam-dunk or subject to debate?
6 posted on
02/24/2008 1:53:38 PM PST by
bukkdems
(Muslims, not rednecks, marry first cousins. http://www.consang.net/index.php/Global_prevalence)
To: bukkdems
As we all know but are sometimes reluctant to contemplate, oil is a finite, non-renewable resource. Is this slam-dunk or subject to debate?
This is according to the gospel of the flat earthers. Have you noticed that air and water are also finite? We need to ration air just as the water police are trying to force us to ration water. Life, nature and the earth are not zero sum games. Everything is renewable and everything cycles. It is a categorical impossibility to run out of anything since we do not get rid of anything. In fact the sky is not falling. That spec is merely star dust in your eye.
11 posted on
02/24/2008 2:02:05 PM PST by
Louis Foxwell
(here come I, gravitas in tow.)
To: bukkdems
"
Is this slam-dunk or subject to debate?" It's "Brittany Spears"
25 posted on
02/24/2008 2:24:15 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson