Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ScratInTheHat
"The amount of energy it takes to build the machine to capture wind energy negates the amount you will get out of it over it’s working life."

Nonsense. I can show you wind turbines that have been running, producing more energy each day that they run than it took to manufacture them, since the mid 60s.

The hills near our ranch are dotted with old, still working wind turbines, that require almost no maintainance (and that is a lucky thing, since people are not inclined to maintain things until they fail).

40 posted on 02/24/2008 3:30:14 PM PST by editor-surveyor (Turning the general election into a second Democrat primary is not a winning strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: editor-surveyor

So if you took the energy output of that windmill it could produce all the energy it takes to smelt the ore, run the machines, etc. etc. without any other energy from any other source to reproduce itself?

That is a tall order.

I just wonder how long it would have to run just to heat a blast furnace one time.

Most of it is a product of cheap oil, or coal.


45 posted on 02/24/2008 4:29:24 PM PST by ScratInTheHat (Don't like my immigration stance? I'm dyslexic. PC keeps sounding like BS to me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson