Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2008 12:24:15 PM PST by girlangler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76; SJackson; Diana in Wisconsin; CrappieLuck; billhilly; Beagle8U; jazusamo; Grammy

Ping.


2 posted on 02/24/2008 12:25:51 PM PST by girlangler (Fish Fear Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: girlangler

Is this the judge?

http://sports.espn.go.com/outdoors/general/news/story?id=2204764


3 posted on 02/24/2008 12:30:43 PM PST by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: girlangler

The Feds own way too much land. Sell it, log it, mine it, and graze it!


4 posted on 02/24/2008 12:35:43 PM PST by Nucluside (Cultural Relativism is a lie; Western culture IS superior)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: girlangler

MATTHEW DALY, Associated Press writer, prefers endless federal pesky paperwork ?


The feds have actually been removing hundreds of miles of existing, historical roads under the title of no new roads.

” making it easier to build roads in remote national forests ...”

BS


7 posted on 02/24/2008 12:47:46 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: girlangler

Tree harvest is not “exploitation”. On the contrary, it is a very necessary step in the successful management of our forest resources.

Wood is, and has been for centuries, a very necessary component in housing and as a source of energy. Forest products include a wide range of highly valuable adjuncts to our current standard of living, from the paper we read in the morning to the natural filtration of pollutants from the air, to the conservation of soil and water deemed so necessary to maintaining the balance of life. But the trees have to be HARVESTED to complete this balance.

Old-growth forests are the most inefficient means of carrying out any of these functions. These old stands of trees have effectively smothered out almost every other plant life in their shadows, they sap the moisture from the surrounding soil, and they contribute little in the capture of carbon dioxide from the air, as compared to young, swiftly-growing plant growth, be it grass, young trees, or algae growing down on the pond.

Nature’s harvest, of course, is at a much slower rate than mankind’s, through beetle infestations the kill trees, the rot and decay of dead trees through the actions of bacteria and saprophytes. Much swifter and more effective are the natural fires that start in old-growth timber, and burn away all the accumulated fuel, a process that had been going on for countless eons long before mankind appeared on this planet. After the passing of the fire, new growth springs up almost immediately, as seeds from suppressed species of plants sprout, and an immediate demand for the raw material of this growth, carbon dioxide, clears the atmosphere swiftly, replacing all the oxygen that was consumed in the vegetative fuel burn.

Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant, and never rises to level much above its current ratio to other gases in the atmosphere, as long as there are plenty of young, growing plants and adequate energy from sunshine. No matter HOW much “fossil” fuel is burned.


9 posted on 02/24/2008 1:01:40 PM PST by alloysteel (No provision for ANY political party was ever written in the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: girlangler

There is no place that liberals have touched that is better because of it. I live in the woods, and I have logged. It made my woods better.


13 posted on 02/24/2008 5:15:08 PM PST by Grammy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson