Posted on 02/24/2008 11:41:11 AM PST by SFC Chromey
If the US, Canada and Mexico are greater as a whole than their parts, then why aren’t we including Guatemala? Isn’t four greater than three? If the premise is accepted then naturally one world government is the most superior form of government possible.
So, is Corsi a kook then? You post a quote from Reagan basically admitting the goal, then puke all over a thread when someone spells out a piece of its implementation?
I don’t get where you’re coming from.
File this under NRUADITWH: Not Relevant Until A Dem Is In the White House. There’s a bunch of stuff to go along with it.
“So, is Corsi a kook then? You post a quote from Reagan basically admitting the goal, then puke all over a thread when someone spells out a piece of its implementation?
I don’t get where you’re coming from.”
Not to worry, “americaunited” doesn’t know where he/she is coming from either. These WND bashers just come on any thread which is from a WND and say it’s not credible...they have no rebuttal, they just call the author, the website and/or anyone who is on the thread disparaging names...the last resort for Lefties & RINO’s who they can’t debate the issues!LOL
Ok, you don't like Corsi, that's fine. But what does that have to do with the substance of what he's reporting? If he reports that Canadian troops have joined up with our troops to quell disturbances, do you doubt it off hand because of the reporter, or click on the link to the CANADIAN site that backs it up? If WND links to it, does it make it BS? I certainly don't like Canadian news sources either, but the fact that we can't find a US link to the story may even have more sinister overtones. Why don't we( the US) report on such an agreement? BECAUSE THEY KNOW IT WILL BE ON FR IN ABOUT A NANO SECOND!!!
The whole reason to come to FR is to find stories culled out by Freepers from all over the world. I've been on a thread when a poster said he was hearing gunshots and explosions in Ecuador( I think), and it was talked about for an hour here before Fox News reported some sort of riot down there.
If you don't believe the story because Corsi talks about it, then thats your problem. But to have the link to the Canadian site and still doubt it, well, I guess that makes you a doubter.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/scp/2008/99368.htm
The US provided $950,000 to support the OAS Electoral Observation Mission in Guatemala
Through the Millennium Challenge Corporation, the U.S. began disbursement of nearly $1 billion in support to El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Guyana, and Peru.
Partnership for Latin American Youth: The United States committed to provide $75 million to help thousands more young people improve their English and to study in the United States.
President Bush announced a $1.4 billion, multi-year security cooperation initiative with Mexico and Central America
Your posts seem to be so brilliant and sophisticated that they are beyond understanding by any useful idiots on this forum.
This made the AP news in our local Liberal Rag, the Houston Chronicle or as it is known locally, the Houston Comical.
And why is that, since I did explain in detail. Corsi gives 'kook' reasons why some of this stuff is happening or being proposed. Ronald Reagan gave the 'non-kook' reasons (see post #45) why we should work closer together.
We’re gonna get the NAU no matter who is elected.
Oh, I see. Anybody for the NAU is a non-kook, those of us opposed to it are kooks. How humble of you.
Wrong. I explained my position quite clearly. You can be against it without making up BS kook reasons.
Your position is this:
There are ‘kook’ reasons and there are ‘non-kook’ reasons.
I get it. The result, however, is the same. So your ‘anti-kook’ reasons serve as justification for it in your mind.
If that’s inaccurate, tell me plainly- do you or don’t you support a closer relationship of Canada, the US and Mexico?
Well, this solves the Posse Comitatus problem.
No wrong again. Two different people are shot and killed. One was killed by a police officer, the other was killed by a criminal. With your simple reasoning, since "the result is the same", i.e., they are both dead, the how/why/motive is meaningless. As long as you think like that, this really can't be discussed intelligently.
We’re talking about National Sovereignty. What’s debatable about that?
So, are you going to answer my question?
I did.
If that’s inaccurate, tell me plainly- do you or don’t you support a closer relationship of Canada, the US and Mexico?
Yes or no.
If what’s inaccurate?
True, but you’ll be locked up for no other reason than to get bribe payments out of you.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.