Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Deception Indicated in Both of Larry Sinclair's Polygraph Tests by First Polygraph Expert
WhiteHouse.com ^ | 2/24/2008

Posted on 02/24/2008 11:11:13 AM PST by NoWayMcCain

Dr. Ed Gelb, Former President of the American Polygraph Association was the Polygraph expert selected by Whitehouse.com. He has done over 30,000 polygraph examinations over his long career. There were two polygraph tests administered by Dr. Gelb on Friday. the first polygraph asked Mr. Sinclair on his sex claims. The second polygraph test asked Mr. Sinclair on the drug use claims. There was deception indicated in both tests. As mentioned yesterday Mr. Sinclair did pass his drug screen so there were no drugs in his system which could have interfered with the test. We have asked Mr. Sinclair on several occasions to put us in contact with the Limousine driver that he named for other news organizations earlier and for us on Friday that was supposed to corroborate his story. As of today he has still not put us in contact with the limousine driver whom he told us he stays in constant contact with.

It was our intention to get to the truth in this serious matter rather than have these allegations that were made almost a month ago drag on to election day. Due to the seriousness of this issue we made the results public today rather than waiting until Monday when we would have received the second expert's conclusions. When we receive the second expert's conclusions we will post those results as well.

We will have all of the written results posted on the site in the next week including video taken of the Polygraph testing so there will be full disclosure and transparency on our part and eliminate any suspicion of any wrongdoing or manipulations of the testing or the results by Whitehouse.com or the polygraph experts. Later this afternoon we will post the actual report by Dr. Gelb.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: barackhusseinobama; larrysinclair; obama; polygraph
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2008 11:11:14 AM PST by NoWayMcCain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoWayMcCain

Loooks like Sinclair’s days on Globe magazine are numbered.


2 posted on 02/24/2008 11:14:58 AM PST by Old Retired Army Guy (tHE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

They’re bailing on the guy early because they aren’t getting traction in the media. must be driving Sid Blumenthal crazy.


3 posted on 02/24/2008 11:17:54 AM PST by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoWayMcCain

Well there you go. He has announced to the world that he is a liar. The only reputation injured is his own.


4 posted on 02/24/2008 11:21:24 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoWayMcCain
Not that polygraph "testing" has any scientific basis to begin with (it doesn't), but the "Dr. Gelb" who conducted the "test" is a phony Ph.D.
5 posted on 02/24/2008 11:22:24 AM PST by George Maschke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick; Sam's Army; Rutles4Ever

Time was, whitehouse.com was a hard-core porn site. What happened to the world I came of age in? This world today is one I hardly recognize.


6 posted on 02/24/2008 11:23:51 AM PST by End Times Sentinel (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

Well it was Sinclair’s idea to take the polygraph. At this point you can’t fault anyone for disbelieving him. He was given his chance to make his case on parameters he himself set. I don’t think an accuser should be discredited right away. But when they fail to make their case based on their own standard of truthful measure, then it is time to take sides. He’s lying.


7 posted on 02/24/2008 11:24:22 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Since you put all your stock in the Sinclair smear, will you now have the decency to apologize?

As I said before, Hillary!ite tactics only make conservatives look like idiots.

McCain can beat Obama on substance, he doesn't need this nonsense. Hillary! on the other hand.... This is right up her alley.

8 posted on 02/24/2008 11:25:20 AM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George Maschke

If Sinclair submits to using the phony doctor then again it is Sinclair’s fault. He set the standard by which everyone was to believe him. He failed. Next.


9 posted on 02/24/2008 11:26:07 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoWayMcCain

Obama voters don’t care about the cocaine.

Unless someone has pictures of Obama in leather chaps, with quart of Crisco and assorted vegetables on a stage at the Folsom Street Fair, I doubt the gay thing matters much to them either


10 posted on 02/24/2008 11:27:39 AM PST by digger48 (http://prorev.com/legacy.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
Yeah.It stopped being a porn site when its owner's kid entered kindergarten. Gee. You might of thought the guy was ashamed at what he was doing or something.
11 posted on 02/24/2008 11:29:13 AM PST by Tribune7 (How is inflicting pain and death on an innocent, helpless human being for profit, moral?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Nice to see some people still have a sense of shame. I’m glad he quit.


12 posted on 02/24/2008 11:31:29 AM PST by Marie2 (I used to be disgusted. . .now I try to be amused.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle
"Time was, whitehouse.com was a hard-core porn site."

Yeah, Presidents are limited to 2 terms max, so that guy had to leave in early 2001.

13 posted on 02/24/2008 11:33:52 AM PST by Sam's Army
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998
pissant did not put all his stock in the Sinclair smear. How about some truthfulness of your own. Sinclair made the charge and he deserved to be tested on his truthfulness because the charges were very serious. He failed his own chosen measure. So what. He now faces the fate of the false accuser. Nothing is different other than the truth was sought and now it appears to be clear. Sinclair lied. Good for everyone who cared to find the truth. Shame on those who think accusers should be discredited right from the start. That's like saying since one cry of rape is a lie, every cry of rape is a lie. If the truth wins everyone wins.

It's a scary day when no one is allowed to make an accusation against a politician. Find the truth and discredit the liar, be it the peon or the politician. Bring defamation charges against Sinclair if you like. We don't need false accusers. But neither do we need to place politicians above the law. In America the law is king, not the politician. If Obama were out breaking our laws while he was a state representative then that is huge and voters need to know it.

14 posted on 02/24/2008 11:38:27 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Old Retired Army Guy

Well that does it!Obameywon’t be gettig the gay and druggie vote.False alarm.


15 posted on 02/24/2008 11:40:35 AM PST by Uncle Meat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
When a few particular posters ran around treating the Sinclair claims as absolute truth, just because they despise Obama, I am going to step up. We are better than the Rats. We don't need smears and innuendo to succeed.

Did you see how they were treating me on the other threads? Go take a look.

Just because I said we shouldn't be helping to spread a Hillary!ite type smear.

16 posted on 02/24/2008 11:42:13 AM PST by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NoWayMcCain

Interrogate him to figure out the Hillary connection. Then go public with that.


17 posted on 02/24/2008 11:44:04 AM PST by Vision ("If God so clothes the grass of the field...will He not much more clothe you...?" -Matthew 6:30)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

I agree, but I think the plan was to stretch it out until 3/4/08.


18 posted on 02/24/2008 11:44:49 AM PST by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

Exactly. Obama is a hard core liberal. THAT is why we should be attacking him. Not because of the middle name his parents gave him or because some 3-time convicted con artists makes up some uncorroborated story.

I really think we can and will beat Obama in November, but we should do it based upon ideas, not tabloid nonsense.


19 posted on 02/24/2008 11:45:20 AM PST by MittFan08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freedomwarrior998

I’m with you. It just sounded to dumb to be true.


20 posted on 02/24/2008 11:45:45 AM PST by MarkeyD (Just another country bumpkin looking forward to Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson