Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A ‘Moral Hazard’ for a Housing Bailout: Sorting the Victims From Those Who Volunteered
New York Sun ^ | Feb 23, 2008 | Edmund Andrews

Posted on 02/24/2008 11:08:55 AM PST by Travis McGee

WASHINGTON — Over the last two decades, few industries have lobbied more ferociously or effectively than banks to get the government out of its business and to obtain freer rein for “financial innovation.” But as losses from bad mortgages and mortgage-backed securities climb past $200 billion, talk among banking executives for an epic government rescue plan is suddenly coming into fashion. A confidential proposal that Bank of America circulated to members of Congress this month provides a stunning glimpse of how quickly the industry has reversed its laissez-faire disdain for second-guessing by the government — now that it is in trouble. The proposal warns that up to $739 billion in mortgages are at “moderate to high risk” of defaulting over the next five years and that millions of families could lose their homes. To prevent that, Bank of America suggested creating a Federal Homeowner Preservation Corporation that would buy up billions of dollars in troubled mortgages at a deep discount, forgive debt above the current market value of the homes and use federal loan guarantees to refinance the borrowers at lower rates. “We believe that any intervention by the federal government will be acceptable only if it is not perceived as a bailout of the bond market,” the financial institution noted. In practice, taxpayers would almost certainly view such a move as a bailout.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: caveatemptor; foreclosure; housing; socialism; subprime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; colinhester

In addition, I’ve discovered the truth of what a lawyer advised me - the law says whatever a judge feels like it says when you go to court.

Many states make eviction nearly impossible. The HOA often lacks the money to pursue it in court, and may find their legal contract isn’t worth squat all compared to a sob story.

The HOA im my Mom’s old neighborhood tried to enforce rules like, “no parking cars in your yard”, only to lose as often as they won. The man across the street from my Mom had 3 cars parked on blocks in his front yard for several years, and the courts backed HIM, not the HOA!


21 posted on 02/24/2008 1:27:33 PM PST by Mr Rogers (Let's win Congress - the Presidency is lost!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
$175k houses to $80k income families are not the problem. In the NE it is $550k houses to $75k families, and in the SW it is $350k houses to $50k families. It is a stretch to get to 4 times pretax income. Half the houses in the country are up at 7 times, instead.
22 posted on 02/24/2008 1:34:44 PM PST by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Good to know, thanks.


23 posted on 02/24/2008 1:44:26 PM PST by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Even my tagline is sad....I can't stand ANY of the candidates!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

“We’re not about to go into a situation where (real estate) prices will go down. There is no evidence home prices are going to collapse.”~~Alan Greenspan, May 21, 2006

Alan Greenspan - PING!


24 posted on 02/24/2008 5:49:37 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

I know as a capitalist I think people should pay their debts and take the licking their actions give them, to including the licking banks should take for making these financially risky loans and using those risky investment vehicles, but if we don’t do something now about this then we may be facing a depression that makes the 1930’s look tame.


25 posted on 02/24/2008 6:06:48 PM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

It’s the “do something” that is problematic. What? You can’t undo the iceberg hit under the waterline.


26 posted on 02/24/2008 7:26:43 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

No, but you can look to abandon ship ASAP and ensure as many people survive as possible. The ship is DITW and will sink.


27 posted on 02/25/2008 8:10:09 AM PST by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: CodeToad

Yep, that’s all you can do at this time.


28 posted on 02/25/2008 11:37:32 AM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Alan Greenspan interview recently. All segments that I can find ended abruptly, but this one lasted about 2 seconds longer than the others.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caIgP3Mnb6g

29 posted on 02/25/2008 5:26:43 PM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779

NOW he tells us!!!!


30 posted on 02/25/2008 5:56:02 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson