Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rellimpank

Michele is an angry black woman that sees whites as racists. I do not think a truly even tempered, non racist man could live with someone so different than his rhetoric would indicate.


58 posted on 02/24/2008 11:21:03 AM PST by ears_to_hear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ears_to_hear
BURN, BABY, BURN!


64 posted on 02/24/2008 11:34:42 AM PST by Palladin (Michelle Obama is Aunt Esther, without the Bible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: ears_to_hear

“Michele is an angry black woman that sees whites as racists. I do not think a truly even tempered, non racist man could live with someone so different than his rhetoric would indicate.” ~ ears_to_hear

America’s first president of color will NOT be a “REgressive” (who calls himself a “PROgressive”) from the Marxist Left political spectrum.

America’s first president of color will be a true progressive visionary. He or she will be a classic liberal (nka a “conservative”) after the order of America’s Framers, F.A. Hayek, Ronald Reagan, et.al.

As I said previously here on FR, the election of Barak Obama (or any other Marxist, Leftist black), would only serve to FURTHER EMPOWER shake-down artist, race-baiters like Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, the ACLU, et.al., ad nauseam.

It would be IMPOSSIBLE for anyone who doesn’t “embrace the same leftist ideology” or isn’t a “person of color” to criticize the policies of an Obama administration without either being labeled an “Uncle Tom” or a “racist”.

That is THE number one reason why Obama will NEVER get the votes of sober-minded, intellectually honest people who love America, and care about what’s in the best interest of ALL of her people.

I think we still out-number the racists, the criminals, and the rest of the greedy, self-serving dregs of society who put personal ambition ahead of their country.

We still have the numbers to defeat the ones who stay up at night inventing ways to cause America’s defeat at the hands of our enemies.

Because of that, I don’t believe that either Mrs. “Stalin” Clinton, or Barak “empty suit” Obama could be elected to the presidency of the United States of America.

In retrospect, we may discover that Obama turned out to be a God-send. Who else could have possibly had a chance of prying such a big chunk of the Clinton’s base right out from under them?

In fact - what other scenerio could we dream up which could possibly wind up being the cause of a land-slide defeat of the ‘RAT ticket in ‘08, REGARDLESS of which of the two gets the nomination?

Think about it. :)


71 posted on 02/24/2008 1:29:45 PM PST by Matchett-PI (Racists, criminals, and all the dregs only have a voice in one Party - all vote 'RAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson