Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The bolded statement shocks me that she was able to get that change in such a union stronghold as DC

Can she get the schools back on track? The jury is still out. I'm waiting to see what type of budget she proposes

1 posted on 02/24/2008 8:00:20 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SoftballMominVA; abclily; aberaussie; albertp; AliVeritas; Amelia; AnAmericanMother; andie74; ...

Public Education Ping

This list is for intellectual discussion of articles and issues related to public education (including charter schools) from the preschool to university level. Items more appropriately placed on the “Naughty Teacher” list, “Another reason to Homeschool” list, or of a general public-school-bashing nature will not be pinged.

If you would like to be on or off this list, please ping Amelia, Gabz, or SoftballMominVa

2 posted on 02/24/2008 8:02:47 AM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoftballMominVA
Can she get the schools back on track?

Were DC public schools ever "on track?"

The only thing that can save students in DCPS is if the Federal government were to impose mandatory school choice for all students in the system.

3 posted on 02/24/2008 8:06:21 AM PST by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SoftballMominVA
About three years ago, the Washington Times ran a piece about the cost of educating one child in the DC public schools and the quality of the results. At the time, it cost over $13,000 per pupil per year and less than 20% of those who graduated were proficient at their grade level in science or math.

Let’s do our own math here:

12 years x $13k = $156,000 (cost to graduate one student)

$156k / 0.20 = $780,000 (cost to graduate a single student proficient in math or science).

The Left/MSM made much about declaring Bush’s strategy in Iraq a failure. How high does the pile of failure have to be before the Left/MSM will allow the idea to creep into the public discourse on education that the model failed long ago.

Since when is it successful public policy to spend well in excess of $3/4 million to graduate a single proficient student from a public school system? I would ask how high the amount has to be before failure is obvious, but I already know the answer: no matter how high it gets, we are still guilty of underfunding it.

(The sad joke on the taxpayers is that the per pupil expenditure figures don’t include the capital costs, such as buildings, real estate and capital repairs. It many not even include the cost of the school buses. So, the cost per pupil is really much higher than stated.)

20 posted on 02/24/2008 9:57:47 AM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson