Skip to comments.
McCain laughing all way to bank
Toronto Sun ^
| 2008-02-23
| Peter Worthington
Posted on 02/23/2008 4:02:52 AM PST by Clive
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
02/23/2008 4:02:54 AM PST
by
Clive
To: Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; Cannoneer No. 4; ...
2
posted on
02/23/2008 4:03:17 AM PST
by
Clive
To: Clive
I don’t like McCain, but I hate the NY slimes. This is good news!
3
posted on
02/23/2008 4:06:21 AM PST
by
crghill
(Jacob Harmenszoon is no friend of mine!)
To: Clive
Still won’t vote for him. He’s Democrat Lite.
4
posted on
02/23/2008 4:12:17 AM PST
by
kjo
To: Clive
The feeling among a growing number of Republicans skeptical about McCain, is that if the New York Times is so intent on wrecking his chances to be president, he can't be all bad. Maybe even worth supporting.I want to know two things.
1:Why THIS story?
2:Why release it now?
This conservative will never support, nor vote for McPainintheass, ever. What part of fantasy land is this author from?
5
posted on
02/23/2008 4:20:10 AM PST
by
sirchtruth
(No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
To: Clive
There’s no basis for the title. Campaign’s attempt to get contributions based on the NYT story does not necessarily mean that the story has caused a flood of contributions or any at all. We’ll know that when contributions are reported sometime in the future unless the campaign lets it be known sooner.
So far I don’t think the campaign has said anything in that regard one way or the other. The story broke only about two days ago after all.
To: Clive
Glenn Beck was saying this last Thursday. I don’t agree. Many people have their minds made up already, the NY Times article didn’t make a difference one way or the other, IMO.
.
7
posted on
02/23/2008 4:41:43 AM PST
by
madison10
To: Clive
So far Hillary has spent about $106 million "on a campaign that is spluttering." Just think what she could do if she got a hold on the federal budget!
8
posted on
02/23/2008 4:50:32 AM PST
by
glorgau
To: Clive
an honourable journalistic careerLike he was always a straight arrow before.
9
posted on
02/23/2008 4:53:15 AM PST
by
arthurus
To: Clive
The NYT did McCain a favor. Question is the timing and who benefits the most in the end?
I have my own theory on that.
10
posted on
02/23/2008 4:58:32 AM PST
by
dforest
To: sirchtruth; madison10
Still, there is some truth in the article. I noticed a difference in tone of some of the talk-show hosts and some of their callers. McCain, more likely his handlers, know that they have to get some of the conservative vote. There may be quite a number of these “vicious” attacks (though strangely, not even the left gave the charges any credence) before November.
Glenn Beck, however, gets it. He was the first to say, “John McCain! are you kidding me!!!”
To: madison10
Many people have their minds made up already Many people haven't heard that there is an election this year, or who any of the candidates are!
12
posted on
02/23/2008 5:24:55 AM PST
by
Lucius Cornelius Sulla
(Mike Huckabee: If Gomer Pyle and Hugo Chavez had a love child this is who it would be.)
To: Clive
For a newspaper to criticize another paper over inaccuracies then you would think they could get their story correct. President Bush served in the Texas Air National Guard, not the National Reserve.
13
posted on
02/23/2008 5:26:34 AM PST
by
ops33
To: Clive
It's put-up or shut-up time for the Times... What the New York Times seems not to understand is that every day is "put-up or shut-up" - every article too. Credibility is easy to throw away...
14
posted on
02/23/2008 5:31:25 AM PST
by
GOPJ
(Do the editors of the L.A. Times realize that illegal immigration is, you know, illegal? Patterico)
To: ops33
Just wondering.
Is the National Reserve the Canadian equivalent of the National Guard?
To: sirchtruth
The McLaughlin Report last night purported that Romney’s
team peddled this to the NewYorkTimes.
Perhaps that explains why RINO-Romney’s race was
only ‘suspended’, if true.
16
posted on
02/23/2008 5:50:43 AM PST
by
Diogenesis
(Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
To: TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
Theres no basis for the title. Campaigns attempt to get contributions based on the NYT story does not necessarily mean that the story has caused a flood of contributions or any at all.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/02/23/2008-02-23_times_article_spurs_cash_surge_for_john_.html
To: arthurus
I caught that line too. Laughable.
18
posted on
02/23/2008 5:59:56 AM PST
by
Eric in the Ozarks
(ENERGY CRISIS made in Washington D. C.)
To: RepublitarianRoger2
Thanks for the link, but it proves nothing. “The aide gave no numbers,”
To: guinnessman
There is no equivalent to the National Guard in Canada. Reserve forces are part ot the Canadian Forces and come entirely under it for command and control and pay and allowances and is part of its T.O.
I think that Worthington just made a slip of the pen. He is a Korean War veteran (infantry officer) so ought to have gotten his terminology correct.
20
posted on
02/23/2008 7:27:10 AM PST
by
Clive
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson