Not acting spoiled. Some might call it integrity.
If the choice is to vote for someone who is less crappy than someone else, I’ll chose a third option.
And even though McCain has “found God” on the illegal immigration issue, I don’t believe him.
Quote from the Godfather that applies — “You need to have a war every ten years or so to get rid of all the bad blood.”
If the Republican party fractures, so be it.
On getting McQueeg, we'll have to just take his marbles away from him. We're stuck unless something happens to him. I don't wish bad on anyone. But, have you see that thingy on his neck recently?
The choice is ALWAYS to vote for someone who is the lesser of two evils.
And what’s wrong with that?
Isn’t it a moral imperative to do what one is able to do to STOP a greater evil?
Yes.
Does it demonstrate “integrity” to sit passively and allow someone who is “more crappy” than someone else to win an election when one could have voted for the “less crappy” person?
No.
If your ox falls in a ditch on the Sabbath, you have two “crappy” choices-—let your ox die (and possibly impoverish your family) or break the Law. Are you arguing you above making such a choice?