Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Delacon

You’re all over the place here.

You claim that you want to retake the Republican party. Okay, fine. I think you’re a nut, but taking back the party from losers like Chuck Hagel is probably something we could agree upon.

You don’t retake the party by insulting and demolishing it.

That’s what you should be doing to Democrats, and why that’s foreign to you, I don’t know. Perhaps you do.

I never responded to the merits of this bill because the main thing I noticed was your reply #1 which wrongfully and shamefully put the blame on Republicans. You can’t defend that either factually or logically. And you sure can’t reconcile it with your tepid defense of the Republican Party you have spent this entire thread tearing apart.

Why did you post this thread if your comment was to blame Republicans? One FRICKIN’ Republican who is a known RINO signed onto this bill. ONE.

You deliberately ignored all the Democrats who sponsored it. You deliberately ignored the realities of the situation as to whether this could pass their committee.

Why did you do that?

Who exactly is your enemy here?

I am a conservative. You are a troll. Up yours.


49 posted on 02/22/2008 7:16:20 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone

Umm, guy you attacked me. If you want to attack anyone, try Phyllis Schlafly. Nah I ain’t hiding behind her. I think I’ve done ok defending my pov. But I posted this article and said what I said. But its Mrs Schafly’s article. Mrs Schafly is the first on this thread to say and I quote “Republicans allowed a bill that carries his name, among nine others, to pass the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by voice vote last week – without any hearings. That means there was no roll-call vote so no member can be held accountable. The same bill passed the House by voice vote last year.” She pointed a finger at republicans. In case you are stupid, Mrs Schlafly almost single handedly stopped the ERA ammendment from passing. Then as now she spotted an egregious bill that everyone thought was warm and cuddly including republicans and shouted it out of existence. Now she IS aiming her ire at republicans just as she did almost 30 years ago. She wasnt talking to dems(who were all for ERA) back then and she isnt talking to dems now. She is attacking republicans as rightfully she should. I agree with her.


60 posted on 02/22/2008 8:04:47 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone

Go get in your big tent so I can burn it down.

You’ve been here a month longer than I have but I still don’t consider you a bonafied conservative.


63 posted on 02/22/2008 8:07:26 PM PST by dalereed (both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone

“You’re all over the place here.”

No I am not. I am attacking the republican party. Gosh I dont think my attacking the democratic party will make it more conservative. Its been my experience anyway.

“You claim that you want to retake the Republican party. Okay, fine. I think you’re a nut, but taking back the party from losers like Chuck Hagel is probably something we could agree upon.”

I want conservatives to retake the republican party in the fusionist image that Reagan cultivated. Call me a nut if you will but conservatives wont have a voice until they unify and force the republican party to adhere to their principles. The repubican party wont listen to conservatives until we once again unify. Yeah we can agree that Hagel is bad but there is a whole lot of Hagel going on within the republican party. McCain is our nominee because of the Hagels.

“I never responded to the merits of this bill because the main thing I noticed was your reply #1 which wrongfully and shamefully put the blame on Republicans. You can’t defend that either factually or logically. And you sure can’t reconcile it with your tepid defense of the Republican Party you have spent this entire thread tearing apart.”

I am hearing the beep beep sound. The article is an attack on republicans. Its why I posted it. You like republicans right now. Maybe you tie yourself to being a republican. I don’t. I am a con. Factually and logically this bill is going to hit the senate floor because republicans didn’t do anything to stop it. Shame on them.

“Why did you post this thread if your comment was to blame Republicans? One FRICKIN’ Republican who is a known RINO signed onto this bill. ONE.”

You judge the members of congress on which R’s have their name on it? Thank god you didnt have a say on the immigration amnesty bill.

“You deliberately ignored all the Democrats who sponsored it. You deliberately ignored the realities of the situation as to whether this could pass their committee.”

LOL. Screw the democrats. I can’t change them. I can only attempt to convince conservative to change our party. I am certainly not inclined to defend the republican party as you are.

“Why did you do that?”

Answered you retard.

“Who exactly is your enemy here?”

Those that think the republican party is a.o.k.

“I am a conservative. You are a troll. Up yours.”

You may be conservative but you havent done anything to show it in defense of republicans. You arent a troll, you are just a weak assed stupid republican.


71 posted on 02/22/2008 8:41:27 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson