Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's sovereignty giveaway plan
worldnetdaily.com ^ | February 22, 2008 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 02/22/2008 2:20:34 PM PST by Delacon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: gondramB

.7% of 13 trillion = 91 000 000 000

Per the CIA Factbook for 2007 (https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/print/us.html)

US GDP = $13.86 Trillion
multiply by .007 = $97,020,000,000
multiply by 13 years = $1,261,260,000,000,000


21 posted on 02/22/2008 3:32:00 PM PST by callisto (CONGRESS.SYS corrupted...Re-boot Washington DC (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
Jeffrey Sachs, who ran the U.N.'s "Millennium Project," which monitors compliance with and progress toward these goals, says that the U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP in increased foreign aid spending would add $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already spends. "We are short by $65 billion each year, which may seem like a vast sum, but it represents just 0.5% of our GNP," says Sachs.

Over a 13-year period, from 2002, when the U.N.'s Financing for Development conference was held, to the target year of 2015, when the U.S. is expected to meet the Millennium Development Goals, this amounts to $845 billion.


Ten cents more per year to the UN is way too much.
22 posted on 02/22/2008 3:32:47 PM PST by snowrip (Liberal? YOU ARE A SOCIALIST WITH NO RATIONAL ARGUMENT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: callisto

>>multiply by 13 years<<

I missed the part about this being over 13 years.

>>multiply by 13 years = $1,261,260,000,000,000<<

Agreed.

Which makes the GOP’s numbers odd.

>>Some of the politicians on Capitol Hill regularly and sometimes secretly attach costly “earmarks” to bills to benefit special interests. Since Senator John McCain says he wants to eliminate those earmarks, he should start with the Barack Obama bill, the Global Poverty Act (S. 2344), which itself is a vastly expanded form of earmark. It commits the U.S. to spending $845 billion to eradicate poverty in the rest of the world. McCain could vote on the bill fairly soon because it could come up for a full Senate vote at any time. Where does he stand on it?<<

Maybe they are figuring an Obama administration will decrease the GDP by a third.

http://www.gopusa.com/commentary/ckincaid/2008/ck_0221p.shtml
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1974711/posts


23 posted on 02/22/2008 3:38:52 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Hey Phyllis, is this the same plan as the Bush-McCain plan?


24 posted on 02/22/2008 3:40:27 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

>>Ten cents more per year to the UN is way too much.<<

Please tell me this money doesn’t go through the U.N..... :(


25 posted on 02/22/2008 3:41:06 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

BTTT


26 posted on 02/22/2008 3:41:25 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

$13.86 is the ‘07 GDP. The original calculation probably uses the actual GDPs for 2002 - 2006 with an estimation of the outlying years from 2008 - 2015, so the variance may lie within the past years and possible estmation of a slower growth for future years.


27 posted on 02/22/2008 3:45:07 PM PST by callisto (CONGRESS.SYS corrupted...Re-boot Washington DC (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Just when you thought republicans have screwed us as much as they could...

Let's see. Do the Republicans control the committee?

How retarded is it to blame the Republicans for something passing out of committee that they have ZERO chance of blocking in committee?

Pretty damn retarded.

You can't filibuster something in committee.

This site is becoming disgusting in blaming Republicans for things Democrats do.

Retarded.

Just declare this forum a third party site and get it over with.

28 posted on 02/22/2008 3:45:25 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

Ooops! I forgot to include a link to one of the “original” recent articles from AIM:

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-global-tax-proposal-up-for-senate-vote/


29 posted on 02/22/2008 3:47:38 PM PST by callisto (CONGRESS.SYS corrupted...Re-boot Washington DC (Y/N)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

“Republicans allowed a bill that carries his name, among nine others, to pass the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by voice vote last week – without any hearings. That means there was no roll-call vote so no member can be held accountable. The same bill passed the House by voice vote last year.

The Obama bill passed out of committee with the cooperation of the co-sponsor, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind. A Rhodes scholar like former President Bill Clinton, Lugar has never seen a United Nations enhancement he didn’t like.”

The voice vote was pubbie approved.


30 posted on 02/22/2008 4:08:09 PM PST by Sybeck1 (It's truly bad when your Savior in November is Judas Himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Do you see the same pattern here that I do?


31 posted on 02/22/2008 4:10:50 PM PST by Halgr (Once a Marine, always a Marine - Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

I see your point, but shouldn’t the republicans on the committee screamed bloody murder about this and oppose it without any hesitation? Instead, it seem as though they just sighed, shrugged their shoulders, and let this crap flow on through without the sligtest challenge.

It’s the lack of a backbone that’s the core issue here....we are already acting like we are back in the 1980’s when our own Illinois House Minority Leader Bob Michael was ok with being a loser.


32 posted on 02/22/2008 4:12:43 PM PST by GLH3IL (This so called 're-deployment' is really a vote catching program. General Patton - 1944)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

A billion here a billion there. A trillion and we are talking real money.


33 posted on 02/22/2008 4:16:37 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Its a bipartisan bill ya idjit.


34 posted on 02/22/2008 4:17:23 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Halgr; processing please hold; ovrtaxt; Borax Queen; potlatch; PhilDragoo
Do you see the same pattern here that I do?

Yes......I most certainly do.

The Obama bill passed out of committee with the cooperation of the co-sponsor, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind. A Rhodes scholar like former President Bill Clinton, Lugar has never seen a United Nations enhancement he didn't like.

Obama's costly, dangerous and altogether bad bill (S. 2433), which could come up in the Senate any day, is called the Global Poverty Act. It would commit U.S. taxpayers to spend 0.7 percent of our Gross Domestic Product on foreign handouts, which is at least $30 billion over and above the exorbitant and wasted sums we already give away overseas.


35 posted on 02/22/2008 4:18:42 PM PST by nicmarlo (A vote for McRino is a false mandate for McShamnesty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Its a bipartisan bill ya idjit.

Kiss off, pal. Just because Chuck Hagel was the lone Republican to "co-author" the bill, we should blame all Republicans?

Yeah, that's real bi-partisan. Yeah, the Republicans really screwed us because Chuck Hagel did something stupid, which couldn't have been stopped anyway.

Some really deep thinking going on in your head.

36 posted on 02/22/2008 4:28:04 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Bite me ahole. This bill hasn’t been significantly opposed by republican congressmen. Our republican congressmen suck and so do their appologist like you.


37 posted on 02/22/2008 4:32:16 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Delacon
Bite me ahole. This bill hasn’t been significantly opposed by republican congressmen. Our republican congressmen suck and so do their appologist like you.

We don't generally refer to our senators as congressmen, but I imagine that's too subtle for you.

Continue your anti-Republican tirade. I'm sure that will help the Democrats, which probably is your goal, anyway.

Sure as hell don't blame the Democrats for a bill that they overwhelmingly support and the Republicans were powerless to prevent getting out of committee. That would involve some logic.

38 posted on 02/22/2008 4:41:29 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

What do you want out of this argument moron? You want this bill to pass? You want a Obama kudo? You want a big gov’t bill? You want to remain an idiot protecting republican legislators?


39 posted on 02/22/2008 4:43:19 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Yes senators are referred to as congressmen. Ya idiot.


40 posted on 02/22/2008 4:44:55 PM PST by Delacon (Don't Immanentize the Eschaton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson