Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia's NATO envoy warns alliance against overstepping mandate in Kosovo
Tha Canadian Press ^ | February, 22, 2008

Posted on 02/22/2008 12:14:12 PM PST by processing please hold

MOSCOW - Russia's envoy to NATO warned the alliance Friday against overstepping its mandate in Kosovo and said Moscow might be forced to use "brute military force" to maintain respect on the world scene.

Dmitry Rogozin said the Russian military also might get involved if all European Union nations recognize Kosovo's independence without United Nations agreement and despite strong objections from Russia and Serbia.

The comments were the latest harsh rhetoric from Moscow protesting Kosovo's declaration of independence, which has sparked violent protests in Serbia and international disagreement over whether to recognize the fledgling nation.

The comments also sparked quick reaction from the U.S. State Department, which urged Russia to repudiate them.

Rogozin couched his threat, however, assuring that Russia was not currently making plans for a military confrontation.

"If the European Union works out a single position or NATO goes beyond its current mandate in Kosovo, these organizations will conflict with the United Nations," Rogozin said in a televised hookup from NATO headquarters in Brussels, Belgium.

If that happens, Russia "will proceed from the assumption that to be respected, we have to use brute military force," he said.

The U.S. ambassador to NATO, meanwhile, said Washington was "very disappointed" by Russia's hostility over Kosovo, and Nicholas Burns, the U.S. State Dept.'s third-ranking official, called Rogozin's statement "highly irresponsible."

"This cynical and ahistorical comment by the Russian ambassador should be repudiated by his own government," Burns said responding to questions in an online discussion.

Later, Sergei Yastrzhembsky, Russia's envoy to the European Union, used a more conciliatory tone, saying the Kosovo problem should be resolved exclusively by political means.

Rogozin - an outspoken nationalist known for his tough rhetoric - told NATO that its 16,000 peacekeepers in Kosovo must "remain neutral" over the contentious declaration.

"Under no circumstances should the alliance get involved in politics," Rogozin said. However, Moscow already was alarmed by reports that authorities in Kosovo had closed the border with Serbia.

Local authorities patrol Kosovo's borders, but the main responsibility for security lies with NATO peacekeepers. On Friday, they sent back several busloads of Serbs seeking to join a rally in the Kosovo Serb stronghold of Kosovska Mitrovica.

Russia has staunchly supported Serbia's to Kosovo's secession, and has vowed to block any efforts in the United Nations to recognize its independence.

In what appeared to be a contradictory comment, Rogozin assured that "Russia was not planning to get involved in any armed confrontation over Kosovo."

"There will be no war between Russia and NATO over Kosovo," he said, though the Kosovo issue "will certainly hamper our dialogue."

Nations that recognized Kosovo's statehood had made "a strategic mistake, similar to the invasion of Iraq," he said.

Other Russian officials have called the recognition illegal and said it could effectively split Kosovo in half. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov warned that Kosovo's secession could lead to regional instability.

More than a dozen nations have recognized Kosovo's declaration of independence from Serbia, including the United States, Britain, France and Germany. Russia has been joined in its opposition by China and others, including EU member Spain.

Rogozin called the violent protests that took place Thursday in the Serbian capital "national wrath that will be hard to curb," and criticized the West for making "a step toward a very cruel and emotional ethnic conflict" in the Balkans.

Predominantly ethnic Albanian Kosovo - which has been governed by a U.N. mission and patrolled by NATO peacekeepers since 1999 - had been widely expected to declare independence from Serbia after internationally mediated talks on its future fell apart last year.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: kosovo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
Looks like Russia has cooled the rhetoric.

A couple of snip its.

Later, Sergei Yastrzhembsky, Russia's envoy to the European Union, used a more conciliatory tone, saying the Kosovo problem should be resolved exclusively by political means.

In what appeared to be a contradictory comment, Rogozin assured that "Russia was not planning to get involved in any armed confrontation over Kosovo."

"There will be no war between Russia and NATO over Kosovo," he said, though the Kosovo issue "will certainly hamper our dialogue."

1 posted on 02/22/2008 12:14:13 PM PST by processing please hold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

The article starts out with a defiant Russia but ends with a softer approach to the problem. Is Russia bi-polar?


2 posted on 02/22/2008 12:15:54 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

“The next war will be caused by some damned fool thing in the Balkans!”

Otto Von Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany


3 posted on 02/22/2008 12:17:58 PM PST by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861

Bismark might be correct somewhere down the line. For now it looks like Russia doesn’t want to tangle with NATO.


4 posted on 02/22/2008 12:20:13 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

More like paranoid schizophrenia.


5 posted on 02/22/2008 12:28:11 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold; TexConfederate1861

“For now it looks like Russia doesn’t want to tangle with NATO.”

Then we should all get down on our knees and thank God that no Americans need to die for George Bush’s dog vomit Mohammedan Albanians in Kosovo anytime soon.


6 posted on 02/22/2008 12:30:06 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Seems like George is trying to pick a fight with Russia. With this and missle defence in Poland, he seems to be trying to lure Russia into a conflict for some strange reason.


7 posted on 02/22/2008 12:31:16 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: microgood

I support Serbia on this issue. Mad Albright was the war monger, who was not looking out for the USA, and Serbia, who had been an ally in WW2.


8 posted on 02/22/2008 12:34:39 PM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: microgood

Maybe because Russia is arming Iran with nukes, North Korea with long-range missiles, rockets for Syria to pass on to Hizballah, bombs for Sudan to drop on Darfur, submarines for Red China, fighter jets and thousands of machineguns for Hugo Chavez, etc., etc. Think that has anything to do with it?


9 posted on 02/22/2008 12:35:57 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
More like paranoid schizophrenia.

I'm inclined to agree with you on that. In my book that's even scarier.

10 posted on 02/22/2008 12:41:11 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kolokotronis
Then we should all get down on our knees and thank God that no Americans need to die for George Bush’s dog vomit Mohammedan Albanians in Kosovo anytime soon.

Amen, but, (there's always a but) Kosovo won't be happy with what they've stolen from Serbia, they'll want more. Islamist always want more and more. They're being appeased now and that's deadly, dangerous and wrong.

11 posted on 02/22/2008 12:44:23 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: microgood
Seems like George is trying to pick a fight with Russia. With this and missle defence in Poland, he seems to be trying to lure Russia into a conflict for some strange reason.

There's always a bigger picture. What's his and the State Departments bigger picture?

12 posted on 02/22/2008 12:46:13 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Are you saying so Russia will back off arming Iran with nukes, North Korea with long-range missiles, rockets for Syria to pass on to Hizballah, bombs for Sudan to drop on Darfur, submarines for Red China, fighter jets and thousands of machineguns for Hugo Chavez, etc., etc.
13 posted on 02/22/2008 12:49:27 PM PST by processing please hold ( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

It creeps me out that we are most likely on the wrong side of this due to some sort of oil related blackmail from the Saudis.

Will we do ANYTHING to kowtow to the oil producing nations.... have we no soul left?

Russia can escalate this very quickly and in the process cause oil prices to skyrocket...they are not stupid you know. And higher oil will bring them more profit too... they could bleed the western world dry...cut off gas to Europe...move troops into Iran out of spite. Russia has been underestimated many times throughout history... I hope we back down from this mess we have created. It takes very little mischief to raise oil prices...and the Russian have always excelled at mischief.

What are we gonna do..shoot at the Russians??? I think NOT.
Even a skinny starving bear can rip your head clean off.


14 posted on 02/22/2008 12:52:12 PM PST by Bobalu (I guess I see'd that varmint for the last time....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

Maybe Russia will back off if we just do whatever Russia demands? Maybe if we just do whatever Russia says, whenever they say it, then do you think they might let us be their friends?


15 posted on 02/22/2008 12:56:00 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Maybe because Russia is arming Iran with nukes, North Korea with long-range missiles, rockets for Syria to pass on to Hizballah, bombs for Sudan to drop on Darfur, submarines for Red China, fighter jets and thousands of machineguns for Hugo Chavez, etc., etc. Think that has anything to do with it?

Could be, but I would rather we confront them directly rather than using Serbia and Poland, who have been our friends in the past, as patsies in our foreign policy with Russia.

It seems to me they have already been through enough in the last century, being sandwiched between Western Europe and Russia.
16 posted on 02/22/2008 12:56:12 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

“Amen, but, (there’s always a but) Kosovo won’t be happy with what they’ve stolen from Serbia, they’ll want more. Islamist always want more and more. They’re being appeased now and that’s deadly, dangerous and wrong.”

Which is why I trust my cousins down in the Balkans are preparing to strangle this little monster in its crib.


17 posted on 02/22/2008 12:57:10 PM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TexConfederate1861
"leave only their eyes to cry with"

-Bismarck

18 posted on 02/22/2008 12:57:44 PM PST by Brian S. Fitzgerald ("We're going to drag that ship over the mountain.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
I support Serbia on this issue. Mad Albright was the war monger, who was not looking out for the USA, and Serbia, who had been an ally in WW2.

I agree. We are using them as pawns in a larger game of chess.
19 posted on 02/22/2008 12:58:52 PM PST by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: processing please hold

We had better be thankful that Russia doesn’t care to.
The Russians are a formidable foe, and they have ALWAYS been the protectors of Serbia. (Hence WWI)

It is a crying shame that Russia is the only country with the guts to defend their Christian brothers in Serbia.

I certainly am not willing to see our troops die to defend Islamic Jihadists in Kosovo.


20 posted on 02/22/2008 12:59:48 PM PST by TexConfederate1861
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson