[SoldierDad]

You're right. And I do realize this. But it's interesting that 372 members/employees were highly motivated enough to contribute to RuPaul, while dramatically fewer were motivated enough to contribute to any other Republican candidate.

Is there any chance that people who are in the military contributed to the campaigns of other candidates, but did not identify themselves as being in the Military? Is there any chance that the other campaigns did not go to the same lengths as the R-U-N Paul campaign to identify those members of the military that contributed? If so, then the fact that under 400 members of the military contributing to R-U-N Paul's campaign means exactly nothing.

[ConservativeJen]

When contributing to a campaign, you have to give your employer, as required by campaign finance laws