You could have of say the same thing about post war Japan in 1946.
Besides, pulling soldiers out before the mission is completed is akin to calling them incompetent...
Not their burden. YOU challenged the O.P., YOU supply contrary evidence.
No one on this thread can provide corroborating evidence that each of the 372 persons listed on the FEC website are ringers.
Each name on that list, for all we know, could go either way from a purely practical perspective.
Which is an admission that you have no proof, and no basis to challenge the sample.
So the question is: are the troops motivated to support a candidate who says that their mission is a lie, that they are dupes, and that they are incapable of accomplishing their mission?
Paul has never claimed that the Military is a bunch of 'dupes', you made that up...as usual.
The mission is in fact a lie. There were no WMD's.
More people than Ron Paul are saying that the present mission of the military in Iraq is not possible. Many of them are retired military. i strongly agree with that assessment. The US Military is for the purpose of nation breaking, (which they do quite well, better than anyone else), not nation building, and certainly not for introducing 'democracy' (whatever that means) to a culture that wants nothing to do with it.
You could have of say the same thing about post war Japan in 1946.
Besides, pulling soldiers out before the mission is completed is akin to calling them incompetent...
Thank you, Cindy Sheehan.
Thank the Lord, and I'm not blaspheming - I literally thank the Lord - that there are some grown-ups in America who have their eyes open and are willing to make serious decisions to defend my family as well as overgrown children like yourself.
"There were no WMDs!" I feel like I've wandered into am Howard Dean fundraiser or a Workers' World Party rally.