Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

that is irrelevant.

here is what would happen.

The schools would have the prohomosexual polics book and the pro-science view on sexual behavior. Rather than have the debate , both books might be scrapped or both books released.

Do nothing and they can say the science debate is over (ala algore) and dismiss any other views.

as it stands now, only one side of the argument ever goes out. we have conservative types, women in particular, who just go with the “born that way” falicy.


65 posted on 02/22/2008 7:25:15 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

Scratch deeper and you’ll find that SEICUS and other sex positive government funded groups don’t care about morality in sex. The whole damned point of the sex positive agenda is to end all moral judgements over sexual pairings regardless of sex, age, relation, marital status, number, or species of partner(s). They see sex as a birthright and that everyone should be sexually active at every age.

The “genetic” origin is a ruse. They could care less. There is no genetic trait for cross dressing. We are born naked. There is no genetic trait for rape fantasy in BDSM.

They DON’T CARE about your morals. They corrupt minors.


69 posted on 02/23/2008 8:47:43 AM PST by weegee (Those who surrender personal liberty to lower global temperatures will receive neither.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson