Posted on 02/21/2008 11:04:42 AM PST by 11th_VA
You appear to be ignorant of the fact that clinton was working with the Iranians to supply arms to the Islamists in Bosnia. It was of great benefit to al-Qa'ida.
Did you also cheer on 9-11?
“I can see the mussies in Detroit claiming independence soon.”
I can see Washington D.C being the first to recognize them.
He should have kicked the crap out of Slobo’s socialist ally Saddam long before 9-11.
Did you cheer when the Serbian fascist thugs set our embassy on fire?
You are the one who claimed that Serbia didnt exist before 1912. As pointed out above, it existed since the Serbs moved into the Roman province of Upper Moesia, which included the territory now called Kosovo in the seventh century and established a state that had a central government and borders. That was before there was a state called Albania. The Albanian tribes were part of the Illyrian people at the time and did not occupy what is now Kosovo.
What is now Albania was a part of the Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and Greece. It was a group of ethnic tribes that warred among themselves rather than a state such as Serbia or Bulgaria. It wasnt until 1246 that Albania became a state called the Albanian Kingdom, a country that only lasted until 1336, and never included present day Kosovo.
You may not know it, but the Roman Empire, the Byzantine Empire, and the Ottoman Empire, no longer exist. Serbia occupies territory that once was part of the Roman Empire, and was occupied by the Ottoman Empire and by Osmanli, but since those countries no longer exists and Serbia is still there, the land is Serbian. You cant claim they are occupying Roman Empire or Ottoman Empire or Osmanli territory. You would have to say that Albania is occupying their territory too since they were part of those long gone countries too.
Just because Serbia was occupied by Ottoman Turks and later by Osmanli does not mean it stopped existing. The Serbs fought these occupations and became free again in 1878 a situation recognized by the countries of the world and formalized by the Treaty of Berlin.
Like Norway, Serbia did not cease to exist just because it was occupied by a foreign power. Like the Norwegians, the Serbs resisted the occupation and won back their independence.
There was never a treaty recognized by the majority of countries I the world that recognized Norway as part of the Third Reich.
Some countries that are occupied do indeed cease to exist. Serbia never did. Countries like Courland, Livonia, Navarra, Navarra, Burgundy, Savoy, Lusatia, Pomerania, Mecklenburg, Silesia, Bohemia, Wallachia, Podolia, Bavaria, to name a few.
It is no more justifiable to bomb France and force them to recognize an independent Burgundy, or bomb the hell out of Germany and make them recognize an independent, Bavaria, or for France to bomb the U.S. and make us recognize an independent state made up of Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California, than for the U.S. to bomb the hell out of Serbia, invade them and make them give up Kosovo.
If some country tried that here, you might think it a fine thing to do. Id be more militant than the Serbs are.
I use to think that your screen name implied that you were a fan of the F-117. Now I realize that instead you are a fan of the Serbians shooting one down.
They can always shoot down a few more for your enjoyment.
Obviously you have me confused with someone else!
I did ask the question of Christopher Lincoln, to the effect, that just because Norway was occupied did it fail to exist? In other words, occupation does not destroy the existance of a nation.
Please reread #940, I copied you because I believe we agree/
sorry about that. I don’t know how I sent that to you. I thought it was going to Christopher Lincoln.
Please excuse me.
No problem!
Thanks
SNAFU
'There is no question that the policy of getting arms into Bosnia was of great assistance in allowing the Iranians to dig in and create good relations with the Bosnian government,' a senior CIA officer told Congress in a classified deposition. 'And it is a thing we will live to regret because when they blow up some Americans, as they no doubt will before this . . . thing is over, it will be in part because the Iranians were able to have the time and contacts to establish themselves well in Bosnia.'" ["Iran Gave Bosnia Leader $500,000, CIA Alleges: Classified Report Says Izetbegovic Has Been 'Co-Opted,' Contradicting U.S. Public Assertion of Rift," Los Angeles Times, 12/31/96. Ellipses in original. Alija Izetbegovic is the Muslim president of Bosnia.]Clinton-Approved Iranian Arms Transfers Help Turn Bosnia into Militant Islamic Base"'If you read President Izetbegovic's writings, as I have, there is no doubt that he is an Islamic fundamentalist,' said a senior Western diplomat with long experience in the region. 'He is a very nice fundamentalist, but he is still a fundamentalist. This has not changed. His goal is to establish a Muslim state in Bosnia, and the Serbs and Croats understand this better than the rest of us.'" ["Bosnian Leader Hails Islam at Election Rallies," New York Times, 9/2/96]
Now you may attempt to downgrade the above because it came from the Republican Policy Committee, but the NY Times echos the same thing.
The Clinton Administration has chosen to ignore weapons shipments from Iran to the Muslim-led Bosnian Government that in the last year have added considerably to Bosnia's military firepower, American officials said today. They said the United States has ample evidence of the Iranian deliveries, which are in violation of the United Nations embargo that bans arms shipments to all combatants in the Bosnian civil war. But they said the Administration had not tried in any way to cut off the flow. The Administration said last fall that it would no longer take part in efforts to enforce the embargo on shipments to the Bosnians.http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=990CE0D9173BF936A25757C0A963958260
Finally, the book Unholy Terror by John R. Schindlerprofessor of strategy at the Naval War College and former National Security Agency analyst and counterintelligence officer goes into much greater detail of the Islamist and clinton.
The long hidden truth is that Bosnia played the same role for al-Qaida in the 1990s that Afghanistan did in the 1980s, providing a battleground where mujahidin could learn to wage holy war. Schindler exposes how Osama bin Laden exploited the Bosnian conflict for his own ends and the disturbing level of support the U.S. government gave to the Bosnian mujahidinjust as had been done with the Afghan mujahidin. Repeating the mistakes of Afghanistan contributed to blowback of epic proportions: Khalid Sheikh Muhammad (the mastermind of 9/11) and two of the 9/11 hijacker pilots were veterans of the Bosnian jihad.
Thank you for your informative and passionate response. I’m not quite sure I understand everything you were referring to, but hey, I try.
I don’t know the answer. Hopefully, with Sarkozy in France and Merkel in Germany, the situation will improve. I understand America’s position as moral and military watchdog of the world, but it is an extremely difficult and heavy load which we cannot continue to carry alone, imho.
I just found this and it’s a little disturbing. I need to do more research, but it seems Soros has his dirty little hands all over this region:
http://www.soros.org.ba/!en/pravo_ustav_bih_01.htm
Pass it on.
I should have included this from the “about us” page:
Open Society Fund Bosnia and Herzegovina
As of its founding in 1993 to - date, the Open Society Fund Bosnia and Herzegovina has been developing program objectives that are in tact with all changes that shape the B&H society, while remaining dedicated to its initiating idea for developing an open society in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The priority program areas of the OSF B&H in the period between year 2004 and year 2006 are Education, Law, Civil Society, Roma, and Local Governance.
Soros is quite the scavenger. Just as Hoplite!
While long-held tradition does call an attack on an embassy a "casis belli", or act of war, our own unwillingness in the past to enforce this makes anyattempt to enforce it for this particular attack both ludicrous, and bigoted. We allowed our embassy in Teheran to be not only attacked, but completely taken over in 1979, and allowed similar acts of war to be suffered even more recently by long standing ally, and charter NATO member Denmark, in the "Cartoon Jihad". So, your point is?
the infowarrior
No, he did not, but he did make sure that it would be possible...
the infowarrior
Interesting stuff.
*sigh* I call BS on your call of BS. Get your own facts straight. Kosovo, at that time was universally recognized as being part of Serbia. Now, tell me exactly how it can be that you invade your own country?
the infowarrior
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.