[Williams]

They should worry, I think, because Obama is a very beatable candidate in the general election. Shamelessly liberal and absurdly inexperienced.

As for the JFK comparison, I would say any given JFK speech had more substance than all of Obama's appearances put together.

[MizSterious]

Anyone who swoons every time he utters the word “change” isn’t concerned about substance anyway.

[Beowulf9]

Maybe we should just call him cotton pickin’ candy.

[Stentor]

I would say any given JFK speech had more substance than all of Obama's appearances put together.

Is Ted Sorensen looking for a job? He made a silk purse out of a sows ear once before.

[snarkybob]

“They should worry, I think, because Obama is a very beatable candidate in the general election. Shamelessly liberal and absurdly inexperienced.”

Obama was able to knock off Hillary because he’s the same kind of opportunist. The Dems have swollen their ranks with newly registered “Youth” voters. There is a very good reason most youths aren’t very accomplished, they’re not very experienced, and as I think the rise of Obama shows, they can be easily led.
I’m not expecting Obamas wonderful numbers to hold up much more than a couple of months after Hillary bows out. Too much Preparation not enough H.