Analysis: Clinton could turn toxic as options dry up

The London Times ^ | February 20, 2008 | Gerard Baker

[Clintonfatigued]

few months back, as Barack Obama’s campaign was just beginning to look like it might seriously challenge Hillary Clinton’s presidential ambitions, a senior Obama campaign official sent a warning to his staff.

It was a succinct message designed to forewarn and forearm his people against what was expected to be a ferocious onslaught from an increasingly desperate Clinton campaign.

“Better get your hazmat suits on”, the memo told them

If they didn’t do it then, the Obama team should now be reaching urgently for the protective outerwear, because following another night of crushing defeat for Mrs Clinton, it seems that the Clintons have only one remaining hope if they are to wrest the Democratic nomination – a highly toxic attack on the man who is now clearly the frontrunner.

[libstripper]

Larry Sinclair is likely to be dropped onto Obvama’s behind very soon. The Witch has no other hope.

[steve-b]

I dunno about hazmat suits, but whoever has to deliver the latest bad news to Her Heinous would be well advised to wear a catcher’s mask and padding (unless they’ve glued down all lamps and ashtrays within reach).

[armourup]

If Hillary does not get the nomination AND the presidency, she and BJ will double cross the U.S. like never before. When he left office he basically went around the world back stabbing the U.S. and gained huge world wide popularity as he did so. This time will be different. He and she will give away military and goverment secrets... or sell them most likely in a fire sale fashion.

There is going to be hell to pay for electing this traitor.. the mistake was made in 1992... but reinforced in 1996. Americans did not care in 1996 that he gave away missle technology and took campaign funds from China....they reeledted him anyway. They will pay for that mistake with the lives of those they love.