[RJL]

“I think we can do that, but it’s going to require us all to maybe give a little and understand the point of view of the other people,” she said. “That’s something I would do as President to really bring people together.”

“We know we need better background checks and we know we’ve got to have mental health information in there,” she said.

OK, that's two things you want, what two gun controls are you prepared to give up in exchange?

Or, is "it’s going to require us all to maybe give a little" really a one way street for more gun control and no relaxation of any restrictions?

Sadly, we know already know the answers to those questions.

[Hazwaste]

“I think we can do that, but it’s going to require us all to maybe give a little and understand the point of view of the other people,”

Since 1934 the giving has been entirely done by the law-abiding citizen who has had their rights continually infringed. The only thing this citizen wants to see out of a "gun summit" is the restoration of the law to the spirit and intent of the Bill of Rights.

[Hillarys Gate Cult]

It’s a simple give and take proposal. We give up all of our rights and they take them. Kind of like in Israel with “land for peace” proposals where the settlers give up their land and get nothing in return.