Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
FALCON understands that “limited government” does not simply mean advocating lower taxes than what the Democrat Party proposes, but also entails a significantly smaller footprint for the necessary bureaucratic institutions, and the complete elimination of the unnecessary and unconstitutional bureaucratic institutions.

That's perfect.

It can never be US policy to allow a supra-national authority to have power to dictate the terms of our taxation, tariffs, incentives or domestic policy.

I assume this means the NAU advocates too. Nice.

Please add me to your ping list.

20 posted on 02/19/2008 6:10:16 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ovrtaxt

When an Indie party has as one of its main issues the overhauling of our tax sytem, I start thinking “S-T-E-V-E F-O-R-B-E-S!” Forbes is no conservative. He’s just a greedy Wall St. bastard. It also make me think “L-I-B-E-R-T-A-R-I-A-N!”, NOT conservative.

Leave the tax system alone. It’s been working and to some degree, it protects small business (with deductions of all kinds). I’m a very small businessman. I want those “protections” PROTECTED! No “fair tax” for me!


26 posted on 02/19/2008 6:15:09 PM PST by levotb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: ovrtaxt

yer on it


28 posted on 02/19/2008 6:15:50 PM PST by pissant (Time for a CONSERVATIVE party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson