Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I hope this is a 12-year-old or a Republican pretending to be a really really dumb democrat (sorry for the redundancy), because I would hate to think that this person will help decide who will be the next president. This explains how democrats keep getting elected.
1 posted on 02/19/2008 5:27:45 PM PST by smokinleroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
To: smokinleroy

While they’re at it...could they lower the price of a gallon of milk and a pound of butter? Maybe lower the price of a package of diapers, too? And why do tennis shoes now cost hundreds of dollars for some canvas and rubber?

Thanks! :)


2 posted on 02/19/2008 5:30:07 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

“Why not establish a gasoline marketing board? “

And just one more smart-@ss comment:

OPEC, anyone? It’s been Oh-so-effective! Not.


3 posted on 02/19/2008 5:31:20 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

Well, duhhhhh... And oil was the cause of the boom in the 90’s—not Bill Clinton.


4 posted on 02/19/2008 5:31:40 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

more small oil


5 posted on 02/19/2008 5:35:51 PM PST by woofie (Hope is bad for cholesterol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

Oh, I am sure Mr. Goebel works for free, aren’t you?? If not, surely he could volunteer to take a 50% pay cut so that his employer can hire another employee.

If it’s a good thing for the oil companies to do, then surely it’s a good thing for him to do, as well!


7 posted on 02/19/2008 5:36:47 PM PST by susannah59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy
"Am I wrong on my math?"

Yes. Actually, you're so far off the mark, you're not even wrong.
8 posted on 02/19/2008 5:38:20 PM PST by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

According to IRS data for 2004, the most recent year available:

Total number of tax returns: 130 million

Number of Tax Returns for the Bottom 50%: 65 million

Adjusted Gross Income for the Bottom 50%: $922 billion

Total Income Tax Paid by the Bottom 50%: $27.4 billion

Conclusion: In other words, just one corporation (Exxon Mobil) pays as much in taxes ($27 billion) annually as the entire bottom 50% of individual taxpayers, which is 65,000,000 people! Further, the tax rate for the bottom 50% is only 3% of adjusted gross income ($27.4 billion / $922 billion), and the tax rate for Exxon was 41% in 2006 ($67.4 billion in taxable income, $27.9 billion in taxes).


12 posted on 02/19/2008 5:40:19 PM PST by gpapa (Kill the terrorists, protect the borders, punch the hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

Maybe we could ask the biggest profit hounds that make the most per gallon to cut their profits. The Federal and state governments!


13 posted on 02/19/2008 5:40:27 PM PST by smokeyb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy
Exxon-Mobil earned $81 billion in profits in the last two years. Are we surprised? Supply and demand — that's what they say. So Exxon-Mobil could reduce the price of a gallon of gasoline to $1.50 and the company still could earn $40 billion in profits in two years. Am I wrong on my math?

If your numbers are correct, it appears they just desire a much larger profit.

14 posted on 02/19/2008 5:41:06 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy
Dear Ron, (author)

When Al Gore demanded that gasoline needs to cost $5.00 per gallon(on national prime time television during debates) in 2004 and half the people in the United States voted for him, do you think the power players of the world's petroleum markets didn't take notice?

15 posted on 02/19/2008 5:43:15 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

who’s “forcing” this twit to buy gasoline?


16 posted on 02/19/2008 5:43:22 PM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy
In a perfect free market, over time producers would not be able to sell their products at prices much higher than what it costs to produce.

Since producers are making large profits it can only mean that supply is being artificially kept down so as not to keep up with demand.

Refineries not being built because of excessively high regulatory hurdles and new sources of oil not being accessed due to environmental prohibitions: these are the artifical barriers to supply.

People are right to be suspicious of oil companies being able to make such high profits for so long.

But they should not point the finger at the suppliers, but at the people, AKA gubmint, that is keeping the current suppliers and potential new suppliers from matching supply to demand and bringing prices more in line with what would be expected in a free market.

19 posted on 02/19/2008 5:45:59 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

Weak dollar.


20 posted on 02/19/2008 5:48:46 PM PST by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy
Am I wrong on my math?

Yes.
1. What percent profit did Exxon Mobil take in?
2. How much in taxes did the government take from Exxon Mobil?

The "author" is an idiot dem for sure.

22 posted on 02/19/2008 5:52:43 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy
"Am I wrong on my math?"

Hey Richard, do you mind if I call you Dick? Yeah, you are wrong on the math.

Sad to say that this moron's thinking is too common in this neck of the woods, which is why murtha is my congress critter and Rick Santorum is no longer my senator.

23 posted on 02/19/2008 5:53:18 PM PST by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

Hey Ronnie, Exxon-Mobil +$1.64 today...woo hoo.


26 posted on 02/19/2008 5:56:49 PM PST by gate2wire (Even when you know, you never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy
Of course, if you earn $100,000 or more a year, or have stock in Exxon, you don't care about that.

When all else fails, break out the class warfare.

27 posted on 02/19/2008 5:58:14 PM PST by Hazwaste (Vote! Vote for the conservative local, state, and national candidates of your choice, but VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

[So Exxon-Mobil could reduce the price of a gallon of gasoline to $1.50 and the company still could earn $40 billion in profits in two years. Am I wrong on my math?]

What margin of profit does $40 billion represent for Exxon?

Just asking.


33 posted on 02/19/2008 6:02:17 PM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy
Gasoline taxes per gallon, August 2005


34 posted on 02/19/2008 6:04:26 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokinleroy

We could also ask to have some of those taxes on gasoline dropped to reasonable levels. In Washington State, we are paying a total of 41.4 cents a gallon (total state and federal).

This dependence on gasoline for taxes causes more problems than high fuel prices. As motorists begin to drive more fuel efficient vehicles and limit their driving, there is less tax revenue. Now what?

In Washington State, the legislature is thinking about tolls on the major freeways to make up for the downfall in revenue. Just what motorists need. Toll booths will make traffic flow worse.

This obsession with taxation from expensive, inefficient government is the root of the problem. And the reason that government is expensive is because of the costs of enforcement for all of the regulations by government.


40 posted on 02/19/2008 6:24:24 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson