“Mr. Sinclair’s extraordinary allegations demand extraordinary evidence to back them up.”
The allegations are ordinary not extraordinary, unless of course you consider Obamam the new Messiah..
I disagree with you about Mr. Sinclair’s accusations being “ordinary.” Mr. Obama is an astute politician who even in 1999 had aspirations for higher political office. It seems unlikely that he would have engaged in such reckless behavior. Mr. Sinclair has offered no evidence to support his sensational claims; instead, in his YouTube appearance, he challenges Mr. Obama to a polygraph showdown. Which doesn’t bolster his credibility, in my book.