Posted on 02/17/2008 6:00:30 PM PST by Admin Moderator
Edited on 02/17/2008 6:17:12 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
OK folks, where should we go from here? Do we continue to post the YouTube video, and the articles about the YouTube video, here on Free Republic?
We've had to pull some articles about this, all sourced to the YouTube video. Some were pulled because they were from porn sites. One site was blocked tonight because of other disgusting content.
Is Free Republic above this or do we want it to be true so badly that we'll post anything about this from any source?
If we're going to discuss this topic we should at least ask for more proof.
Thanks.
Because something seems wild doesn't mean it's not true. I don't put anything past any politician.
Just because WND is one of only two media outlets to cover this story does not mean it is not a biggie. It is all over the blogosphere. The MSM is terrified that their empty suited savior is really a bisexual crackhead.
That is why as we speak there are investigations trying to discredit Sinclair, but none that are trying to discredit Obama. If this were a republican, it would be headline news on every single MSM outlet after the guy agreed to the lie detector test and they would be scouring the streets of illinois looking for other drug/sex partners.
You are saying Obama has more credibility that a gay crack whore? I don’t. He is a serial liar just like slick willie.
Bizarre accusations of slick willie raping a gal and telling her to “put some ice on it” seemed to have been part and parcel of FR at one time.
The reason conservatives believe Juanita is because we knew what a slime ball slick was. Obama is just as slimy. He wrote a book that admitted his drug use to insulate him from the charges that would certainly be exposed. Little did he know that his timeline would be challenged by some dude who smoked him. Like I said, I’ll side with a coke whore over a democrat politician.
Plus, I actually listened to 2 long interviews he gave. One to Jeff Rense and another to Right Perspective Radio. Sounds pretty confident of himself to me.
Such is your right.
Won't exactly help us win the hearts and minds of independents, though. Which we need to win an election in the best of years.
I see a disaster looming for us - Obama is a modern-day Reagan, selling hope and optimism. In response, we offer little more than bizarre rants and impotent conspiracy theories. Which one will voters choose in November?
If you see Obama as a modern day Reagan there is nothing I can do to help you. LOL. Good luck.
Now, now. That’s not what I said.
I didn’t mean that they share policies, but Obama learned something very important for Reagan - Americans love optimism. They don’t want gloom and doom, they want sunny skies. That’s where all this “hope” rhetoric comes from. And the nation is eating it up.
I’ve been listening to Limbaugh for years, but he’s finally gone around the bend. He used to explain Reagan’s greatness in just that way, but now he excoriates Obama for doing exactly the same thing.
We’ve become the party of doom. We’re the ones with no substance to offer, just dark rumors and conspiracy theories. Meanwhile Obama will keep running right along with his optimistic speeches, looking better as we look worse and worse.
We’ve lost sight of what works, and that’s why we’re going to get pasted in November.
Well actually, I’m oprimistic, and will be working very hard to restore the Reaganism that is missing from many “conservative” circles these days.
But that does not mean there is not a time and place to expose such charalatans as Obama for the empty suited, commie dirt ball that he is.
Keep in mind, he was rated as one of THE most liberal senators. That my friend is not optimism, just because he smiles when he tells you he is gonna f*** us.
Not disagreeing with you.
But the proper response to him is truth, not lies.
Yes. And if, I said if, this accusation is true - and frankly, after listening to Mr. Sinclair give two in depth interviews detailing the encounters there is a pretty good chance he is being truthful - then we won’t have to even worry about Obama’s faux optimistic neo-marxism.
This is far worse than our own beloved Larry Fag’s activities.
With all due respect that is total BS. Unlike the lamestream FR has integrity and is not afraid to post a retraction and apology.
I am not disagreeing with you. I wasn’t pointing the finger at FR but mainly suggesting journalistic fraud is a matter of routine with the OLD MEDIA.
It is a real stretch to consider that bore optimistic in any way shape or form. And the silly RR comparison is very telling.
What about the blue polyester pants?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.