[detch]

She’s right about one thing.

He gives great speeches — which by default is an admission that she gives boring ones.

I agree with her — his speeches are good, hers are incredibly lame.

[beaversmom]

I guess I’m in the minority, but I don’t think he gives great speeches. I believe that most lefties think he gives great speeches, but to me they are vacant and boring and phony.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

His speeches are good — especially if you have a hankering banal, sophomoric, inane, vacuous tripe.

[cgbg]

Hillary is running for President with no real accomplishments of any kind, terrible negative charisma, horrible nails on the chalkboard speeking technique, and a stupid campaign strategy consisting of fake town meetings with planted questions that provide an opportunity to prove she has nothing to say that wasn't ghost-written for her in that neo-fascist "It Takes A Village" tome.

Her management and negotiation style is vintage Attila The Hun ("obey or you are fired dumbass").

She is a lousy wife who enables her drug-addled cheating husband while she plots to take it out on all other men on the planet.

This jerk is a caricature of everyone's worst nightmare mother-in-law or ex-wife.

It is embarassing to the planet that she even appears in the public square.

[Seaplaner]

Lame? Yes.

Then, there's also the matter of tone.

While I don't normally go in for some of the various names for Hillary Rodham, there is one that seems to somehow fit..."Screech".

Hillary has an odd " screechy" speaking voice that for some reason seems to "shout" mental instability.