I note that this sentence is missing any comparison to its object. It is a deliberate omission, therefore you are without integrity. Allow me to complete it:
I understand why you prefer OBAMA and the DEMs. You think conservatism is better off as a minority/obstructer than being undermined, defunded, and have conservative candidates replaced with their enemies, big-spending corporate crooks that gave Republicans the bad name that cost them their swing support in 2006.
There, fixed it.
Its easier and more reliable than actually having power and leading. I get it.
Apparently you don't. Conservatives won't have power under McCain. His buddies Ted Kennedy and Rich Feingold will. McCain will appoint liberals in charge of the GOP, thus depriving conservatives of ANY voice. The candidate farm system will be purged of support for conservatives, thus depriving us of future candidates for higher office.
This is exactly what was done in California. Conservatives are worse off under Arnold than they ever were under Gray Davis.
Go OBAMA!
This kind of posting is beneath contempt and earns you nothing but animosity for you and your position.
There, fixed it.
That's perfectly fine with me. I wasn't omitting anything. What am I going to do? Conceal your rationale from yourself? Get hold of sanity! I understand your rationale for preferring Obama and the Dems this year. If you feel more comfortable restating that rationale, it doesn't bother me and doesn't change my point: you prefer Obama and the DEMs this year.
This kind of posting [Go Obama!]is beneath contempt and earns you nothing but animosity for you and your position.
You obviously are very uncomfortable and sensitive about your position. If you want McCain to lose, you want Obama to win. Inescapable. I don't know why you have a problem with that.