Skip to comments.
MIT: No easy answers in evolution of human language
Massachusetts Institute of Technology ^
| David Chandler, MIT News Office
Posted on 02/17/2008 7:01:56 AM PST by decimon
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-128 next last
1
posted on
02/17/2008 7:01:57 AM PST
by
decimon
To: SunkenCiv; blam
2
posted on
02/17/2008 7:03:00 AM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
Its so chaotic, its like weather forecasting, Say what? The Global Warming Climate Change monkeys have forecasting down to a pseudoscience.
3
posted on
02/17/2008 7:05:42 AM PST
by
csvset
To: decimon
That was based on research showing that the gene seems to be connected to language ability because some mutations to that gene produce specific impairments to language use ... I see where they're coming from. It's like the clamp that holds the hose from my gas tank to the engine. When that clamp is missing, my car doesn't run. So the conclusion is obvious.
4
posted on
02/17/2008 7:08:28 AM PST
by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: decimon
Why are we hearin’ from ole Mit? I thought he was out of the race.
5
posted on
02/17/2008 7:11:40 AM PST
by
saganite
(Lust type what you what in the “tagline” space)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
It's like the clamp that holds the hose from my gas tank to the engine. When that clamp is missing, my car doesn't run.The car won't run but it will do a Copenhagen two-step.
6
posted on
02/17/2008 7:12:54 AM PST
by
decimon
To: saganite
Why are we hearin from ole Mit? I thought he was out of the race.He's lent his voice to McCain.
7
posted on
02/17/2008 7:14:18 AM PST
by
decimon
To: decimon
The Holy Bible (specifically: Genesis, Ch. 11, Verse 7) states quite clearly how languages came into being.
End of discussion.
To: decimon
The real problem with bringing genes and "evolution" into studies about the origins of language is that macro "evolution" almost certainly isn't true. So trying to fit the development of language into it isn't going to help further the study of the development of language. It can only harm it.
ML/NJ
9
posted on
02/17/2008 7:15:42 AM PST
by
ml/nj
To: alexander_busek
The Holy Bible (specifically: Genesis, Ch. 11, Verse 7) states quite clearly how languages came into being. End of discussion.
:rolleyes:
10
posted on
02/17/2008 7:17:28 AM PST
by
ketsu
To: decimon
Language is interesting stuff. As i’m picking up bits and pieces of my girlfriend’s native language (Serbo-Croatian) I’m finding similarities in some very common words.
11
posted on
02/17/2008 7:17:34 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
To: alexander_busek
12
posted on
02/17/2008 7:18:19 AM PST
by
decimon
To: alexander_busek
Maybe you should write the people at MIT and tell them how it is.
(For those that don’t know the above was smothered in sarcasm.)
13
posted on
02/17/2008 7:18:33 AM PST
by
AntiKev
(Von nichts kommt nichts.)
To: cripplecreek
As im picking up bits and pieces of my girlfriends native language (Serbo-Croatian) Im finding similarities in some very common words.Yeah, they call us the same things in every language. Don't worry about it. ;-)
14
posted on
02/17/2008 7:20:12 AM PST
by
decimon
To: alexander_busek
Actually Genesis only gives an indication as to how
different languages arose, but not as to how the first language came about.
ML/NJ
15
posted on
02/17/2008 7:20:47 AM PST
by
ml/nj
To: ketsu
Funny how we don’t all speak Aramaic. Must be the work of the devil.
16
posted on
02/17/2008 7:21:08 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
To: decimon
Yeah, they call us the same things in every language.
I told her that that was one of the reasons I wanted to learn. I wanna know when I'm being insulted.
17
posted on
02/17/2008 7:22:29 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
To: ketsu
“The Holy Bible (specifically: Genesis, Ch. 11, Verse 7) states quite clearly how languages came into being.
End of discussion.
:rolleyes:
Mega dittos to you.
To: cripplecreek
English and Serbo-Croatian are both Indo-European languages so there is some basic similarity in root words.
Ask her the word for ‘cloth’ and you should get something that sounds like ‘linen’.
Also for ‘beech tree’ or ‘birch tree’, and ‘bear’as in carry, numbers one to ten, etc.
Hey, you two have fun!
To: squarebarb
It came up when she asked if I needed to pick up some groceries and I told her that I had “none, zero, zilch, nada,” and she added “nula” which is too similar to “null” to be coincidence.
However nula takes the place of several different no, none, and zero words depending on tone of voice and context which are clearer if someone can read cyrillic.
20
posted on
02/17/2008 7:42:22 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Just call me M.O.M. (Maverick Opposed to McCain.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-128 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson