Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cowboyway
People can read the article (pdf) and decide for themselves. You have a problem with that? Shoot the messenger again? How about the Presidents tax panel? Done cutting that one down yet?
375 posted on 02/17/2008 8:09:53 AM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: xcamel; All
People can read the article (pdf) and decide for themselves. You have a problem with that?

The problem with the article is that it is a factually inaccurate hit piece. Posting your FairTax FUD on FR is one thing but writing a paper that is intentionally inaccurate is unethical.

Shoot the messenger again? How about the Presidents tax panel? Done cutting that one down yet?

You should take your 'thought-nazi' and strawman arguments back over to DU where they belong.

BTW, if the FairTax has 'zero chance' that congress would ever enact it, why do you anti-FairTaxers expend so much energy fighting it?

393 posted on 02/17/2008 8:46:15 AM PST by cowboyway ("No damn man kills me and lives." -- Nathan Bedford Forrest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson