Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Silverback
Excellent point, but did you mean....

“If we accept an inept commander in chief in a time of war so we can pick up seats [later]sic, we have chosen party over country. I will not do so.” ?

I agree completely with the above statement. Four days of a Clinton/Obama administration would be too many, even if it ensured a majority in two years. Four years is unthinkable. Better an actual war hero, and the father of a military veteran just back from Iraq than an administration that ‘loathes’ the military.

81 posted on 02/15/2008 7:15:29 AM PST by allmendream ("A Lyger is pretty much my favorite animal."NapoleonD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
I did mean earlier, becaause I think the GOP will get the Congress back eventually (there's no such thing as a permanent majority) and the sixth year of a Dem administration would be the most likely time. That said, your version is better and I'll be using that from now on.

Hillary could come back (don't believe the witch is dead until her feet curl back under the house) but I'm seeing Obama as the likely Dem nomminee, and I noticed something about him the other day: He was still pooping in a diaper when McCain was sitting alert in Skyraiders on the Enterprise during the Cuban Missile Crisis.

86 posted on 02/15/2008 7:27:14 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (It is not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson