Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Satellite Shot Offers Navy Key Space Defense Trial: How It Works
Popular Mechanics ^ | 2/14/08 | Joe Pappalardo

Posted on 02/14/2008 3:50:01 PM PST by Dawnsblood

In a joint news conference, NASA administrator Michael Griffith and Gen. James Cartwright, the No. 2 officer at the Defense Department, announced that an SM-3 missile, designed to hit inbound ballistic missiles, will be fired from a Navy cruiser or destroyer during the next month to obliterate the inbound spacecraft. The idea is to break apart the satellite to rid it of toxic fuel onboard by smashing its tank, which is the largest intact piece left. If successful, it would be the first direct U.S. test against a satellite since 1985, when an F-15 climbed to 80,000 ft. to fire a three-stage missile at a defunct solar-monitoring platform in low-Earth orbit.

(Excerpt) Read more at popularmechanics.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: missiledefense; missledefence; nasa; navy; satellite; usn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

1 posted on 02/14/2008 3:50:03 PM PST by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
I'm bummed they aren't going to use my idea. I say we send up someone in the space shuttle with a shoulder launched RPG and have the shuttle do a fly by while our boy is outside on a space walk. Then, as the shuttle passes by, he just blasts it.

I'm not sure it would work (probably not), but man, wouldn't it look cool on film if it did? I'm just sayin', ya know?

2 posted on 02/14/2008 3:58:02 PM PST by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

3 posted on 02/14/2008 4:00:41 PM PST by meandog (Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 325 and counting! Stay home and get Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64

Tough shot, crossing orbits and all, still, chuck norris could do it with bottle rockets and old scuba gear.


4 posted on 02/14/2008 4:01:18 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Yup. I was thinking maybe just slide by at a slightly faster speed, and then as it passes behind the shuttle....KA-BOOM!

If Chuck Norris isn't available, I bet Bruce Willis could pull it off (oh...wait...that was a different movie...)

5 posted on 02/14/2008 4:05:12 PM PST by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64
I'm not sure it would work (probably not),

Sure it would. RPG is pretty much recoiless, and thus firing it would not knock the astronaut ass over elbows like firing a high powered rifle would.

However that satellite may be fairly large. If so it would probably take more than one RPG round to do the job. Problem would be that after the first, the satellite itself would be going ass over elbows, both in rotation and translation. It wouldn't be such an easy target after that.

Still, we should be getting some cool video from this. We'll also be getting screams and moans from the Russians and the Chinese, even though the Chinese did pretty much the same thing last year. Then of course there is our own "Peace at Any Price" crowd.

6 posted on 02/14/2008 4:06:41 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Just the threat of Chuck Norris going into space would cause the satellite to respond to commands.


7 posted on 02/14/2008 4:08:55 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Tough shot, crossing orbits and all, still, chuck norris could do it with bottle rockets and old scuba gear.

Sounds more like something MacGiver would do. Chuck would just fly up and whack the thing. Maybe shoot it with his .45 as it began it's reentry. :)

8 posted on 02/14/2008 4:12:38 PM PST by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

News on the Hour clarified that the shot would be timed to strike the satellite just as the satellite is entering the atmosphere, which would break it apart and especially let the toxic stuff escape before it can do any damage down on the deck. Degree of difficulty at least 5X anything China has done in this event.


9 posted on 02/14/2008 4:12:54 PM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

We live in an expanding universe and do you know why?
Because it’s trying to get away from Chuck Norris.

Hahaha, hope this just fries the peacenik no space war folks. No vacuum for Oil!


10 posted on 02/14/2008 4:13:48 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tet68
... chuck norris could do it with bottle rockets and old scuba gear.

And Jack Bauer could do it using his jock strap as a sling shot.

11 posted on 02/14/2008 4:14:58 PM PST by LiberConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

Well, I had figured that the RPG probably wouldn’t cause a recoil problem, but I hadn’t thought about the satellite getting knocked all wobbly if it didn’t break up. Hmmmm......we’re going to need a really good charge on the end of that projectile (unless, maybe the satellite isn’t all that big??).


12 posted on 02/14/2008 4:15:32 PM PST by Pablo64 (What is popular is not always right. What is right is not always popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Note to self...........

When launching crap into orbit, a self destruct charge initiated by ground control at the appropriate time would be a lot more practical. For all we know they are going to do that anyhoo, they may just want the world to think our high speed computers can shoot a rocket bomb thru an innertube, both travelling at mach 7 in conflicting trajectories.

13 posted on 02/14/2008 4:19:25 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

This satellite is evidently a piece of dead space junk. If so, the built-in scuttling charges wouldn’t work.


14 posted on 02/14/2008 4:24:02 PM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Degree of difficulty at least 5X anything China has done in this event.

Yeah, but how will the East German judge score it? ;-)

15 posted on 02/14/2008 4:28:26 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
News on the Hour clarified that the shot would be timed to strike the satellite just as the satellite is entering the atmosphere, which would break it apart and especially let the toxic stuff escape before it can do any damage down on the deck.

Good, at least that will reduce the debris cloud that stays in orbit. And I think we're doing this for other reasons than destroying the fuel.

16 posted on 02/14/2008 4:30:52 PM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Commie Bloc Judge:
DoD 3.0
Style 5.1
Tech 2.9

Silver at best


17 posted on 02/14/2008 4:35:14 PM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: glorgau
Who needs writers on the Letterman show? With lines like that, who needs to watch Letterman at all.

Very, very funny!

18 posted on 02/14/2008 4:35:32 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood

Hopefully, all of the shrapnel from this shot will still come down. We don’t need any more junk in space.


19 posted on 02/14/2008 4:39:28 PM PST by chopperman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pablo64
I'm not sure it would work (probably not), but man, wouldn't it look cool on film if it did? I'm just sayin', ya know?

Hehehehee ... would look kinda cool:) But it wouldn't work for one simple fact:

Newton's Third Law: For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Recoil, man .. the recoil would send the Astronaut spinning off in the opposite direction ........

20 posted on 02/14/2008 4:49:12 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson